A plant physiologist formulated the following hypothesis:
*Hypothesis*: Under constant high-light conditions, the rate of transpiration in a particular plant species is determined solely by stomatal conductance. Consequently, any environmental change that reduces stomatal conductance will result in a proportionally identical decrease in the transpiration rate.
To test this hypothesis, the physiologist placed several plants in a controlled chamber under constant high-light conditions. Stomatal conductance and transpiration rate were measured at various relative humidity (RH) levels. Measurements taken at RH served as the baseline (). The results are shown in the table below:
| Relative Humidity (RH) | Stomatal Conductance (% of baseline) | Transpiration Rate (% of baseline) |
|---|---|---|
| (Baseline) | ||
Which of the following modifications to the physiologist's hypothesis is most consistent with these results?
- AThe rate of transpiration is independent of stomatal conductance, and is instead determined solely by the relative humidity, which shares a direct, positive relationship with the transpiration rate.
- The rate of transpiration is determined by multiple interacting factors; a decrease in relative humidity increases the evaporative gradient between the leaf interior and the air, which can increase transpiration even as stomatal conductance decreases.Answer
- CThe rate of transpiration is determined solely by stomatal conductance, but the decrease in relative humidity caused an increase in the leaf's internal water vapor concentration that kept stomatal conductance high.
- DThe original hypothesis remains valid because the transpiration rate would begin to decrease proportionally once stomatal conductance falls below a threshold of of the baseline.