For centuries, cartography was as much an exercise in artistic imagination as it was in geographical measurement. Mapmakers of the Renaissance filled the vast, unexplored spaces of the oceans with detailed illustrations of mythical sea monsters and elaborate wind roses, signaling not a lack of scientific rigor to their contemporaries, but rather a holistic view of the cosmos where art and science were inextricably linked. However, by the mid-eighteenth century, the rise of systematic triangulation and the demands of imperial navigation ushered in an era of austere precision. To these new, mathematically minded surveyors, the decorative embellishments of their predecessors were not merely superfluous; they were a dangerous distraction, a cluttering of the state's geopolitical reality with whimsical falsehoods. Yet, in their rush to strip the map of its monsters, these modern cartographers also stripped it of its narrative, transforming the map from a storytelling canvas into a sterile instrument of control.
Which of the following best describes the author's attitude toward the transition from Renaissance cartography to modern surveying methods?
- Disapproving of the sterile, purely functional nature of modern maps at the expense of artistic storytellingAnswer
- BEnthusiastic about the technological progress and safety improvements brought by systematic triangulation
- CIndifferent, presenting a purely historical comparison of the two mapping eras without taking a stance
- DWhimsical, expressing a desire to restore mythical creatures to contemporary navigation charts