Question

Difficulty: HardIdentifying Points of Disagreement

### The Late Ordovician Mass Extinction

The Late Ordovician Mass Extinction (LOME), which occurred approximately 445 million years ago, resulted in the loss of about 85% of marine species. Two scientists discuss the potential triggers and environmental mechanisms responsible for this event.

Scientist 1
The LOME was primarily caused by a sudden, intense period of global cooling initiated by the growth of the Gondwanan ice sheet. This glaciation locked up water, causing global sea levels to drop by over 100 meters100\text{ meters}, which eliminated shallow epicontinental sea habitats. The subsequent rapid deglaciation released vast amounts of freshwater, creating a stratified ocean. This stratification slowed thermohaline circulation and led to widespread marine anoxia (oxygen depletion) in the warming oceans, driving the second pulse of extinction. Throughout both pulses, atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2CO_2) levels decreased significantly due to the rapid silicate weathering of the rising Appalachian Mountains, which drew down CO2CO_2 and drove the cooling.

Scientist 2
The LOME was triggered by large-scale volcanism in the Altai-Sayan region, which released massive quantities of greenhouse gases, primarily CO2CO_2 and sulfur dioxide (SO2SO_2), into the atmosphere. The immediate result was intense global warming and severe ocean acidification, which devastated marine calcifiers. As volcanic activity subsided, the rapid chemical weathering of the newly exposed volcanic rocks caused a sharp drawdown of atmospheric CO2CO_2, leading to a brief, secondary cooling phase and minor glaciation. The primary driver of the marine extinction, however, was widespread ocean anoxia. This anoxia persisted from the initial warming phase through the cooling phase because elevated temperatures and continental runoff fertilized massive algal blooms, whose decomposition depleted marine oxygen.

Match each environmental variable on the left to the statement on the right that best describes the specific point of disagreement between Scientist 1 and Scientist 2.

  • Initial global temperature change during the onset of the extinction eventScientist 1 asserts that cooling occurred, whereas Scientist 2 asserts that warming occurred.
  • Primary geological trigger of the extinction eventScientist 1 attributes it to glaciation, whereas Scientist 2 attributes it to volcanic eruptions.
  • Mechanism driving marine anoxiaScientist 1 attributes it to slowed circulation from melting ice, whereas Scientist 2 attributes it to algal blooms.
  • Trend in atmospheric CO2CO_2 levels at the initiation of the eventScientist 1 claims levels decreased due to continental weathering, whereas Scientist 2 claims levels increased due to outgassing.

Answer

Each environmental variable must be matched with the statement detailing how the two scientists disagree on its state, cause, or trend: Initial global temperature change corresponds to Scientist 1 claiming cooling and Scientist 2 claiming warming; Primary geological trigger corresponds to Scientist 1 claiming glaciation and Scientist 2 claiming volcanic eruptions; Mechanism driving marine anoxia corresponds to Scientist 1 claiming slowed thermohaline circulation from melting ice and Scientist 2 claiming algal blooms; Trend in atmospheric carbon dioxide corresponds to Scientist 1 claiming a decrease due to weathering and Scientist 2 claiming an increase due to outgassing.
The correct matches accurately pair each environmental parameter with the specific point of disagreement between the two scientists: the initial temperature change (cooling vs. warming), the geological trigger (glaciation vs. volcanism), the mechanism of anoxia (slowed thermohaline circulation vs. algal blooms), and the atmospheric carbon dioxide trend (decrease due to weathering vs. increase due to outgassing).

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze Scientist 1's claims regarding each variable.
Scientist 1 claims: initial temperature was cooling; trigger was glaciation; anoxia was caused by melting ice slowing ocean circulation; and carbon dioxide decreased.
Establishing a baseline of Scientist 1's position on all four key variables is necessary before comparison.
2
Analyze Scientist 2's claims regarding the same variables.
Scientist 2 claims: initial temperature was warming; trigger was volcanism; anoxia was caused by algal blooms; and carbon dioxide increased initially.
Establishing Scientist 2's position allows identification of direct contradictions with Scientist 1.
3
Match the points of disagreement one-by-one based on the contrasted variables.
Initial temperature (cooling vs. warming); Trigger (glaciation vs. volcanism); Anoxia (slowed circulation vs. algal blooms); Carbon dioxide trend (weathering decrease vs. outgassing increase).
Directly links each variable to the specific opposing mechanisms or states proposed by the two scientists.

Key Concept

Identifying Points of Disagreement
Estimated Time:2m 30s
Rate this question