Question

Difficulty: HardIdentifying Hypotheses and Beliefs

Ancient Lunar Magnetic Field Models

The Moon currently lacks a global magnetic field, but magnetized crustal rocks indicate it possessed one between 4.254.25 and 3.56 billion years ago3.56\text{ billion years ago} (Ga\text{Ga}). Two models are proposed to explain this ancient lunar dynamo:

*Model 1 (Thermal-Compositional Dynamo)*
This model proposes that the lunar dynamo was driven by thermal and compositional convection within a liquid metallic core. As the core cooled, solid iron crystallized at the center, releasing lighter elements (such as sulfur) into the remaining liquid outer core. The buoyant rise of these lighter elements, combined with heat loss, drove fluid convection that maintained a continuous, stable magnetic field of approximately 100 μT100\text{ }\mu\text{T} for nearly 700 million years700\text{ million years}, ending only when core crystallization was complete.

*Model 2 (Mechanical Impact Dynamo)*
This model proposes that the lunar dynamo was not continuously active but was periodically restarted by massive basin-forming impacts. A giant impactor would transfer immense angular momentum to the Moon’s mantle, temporarily altering its rotation rate relative to the liquid core. This differential rotation at the core-mantle boundary generated shear and turbulence in the liquid core, initiating a dynamo. Each dynamo event lasted only 10 to 20 million years10\text{ to }20\text{ million years} before friction synchronized the rotation of the mantle and core, extinguishing the magnetic field until the next major impact.

Statement: According to Model 2, a lunar crustal rock that crystallized continuously over a 50-million-year50\text{-million-year} period of impact quiescence (a time with no large impacts) would record a strong, steadily active global magnetic field throughout its entire formation.

Answer: Answer

Answer

The statement is false because Model 2 claims that the lunar dynamo is transient and only operates for 10 to 20 million years10\text{ to }20\text{ million years} following a massive impact. During a 50-million-year50\text{-million-year} period of impact quiescence, the dynamo would be inactive for the majority of the time, so a rock forming continuously throughout this period would not record a steady magnetic field.
The correct answer is false because Model 2 clearly states that the magnetic field is a temporary phenomenon triggered by impacts, lasting at most 20 million years20\text{ million years}. A 50-million-year50\text{-million-year} window without impacts would leave the Moon without a global magnetic field for at least the latter 30 million years30\text{ million years} of that interval, meaning any rock forming continuously throughout this duration would not record a steady field.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the mechanism and duration of the magnetic field proposed under Model 2.
Model 2 asserts that the lunar dynamo is not continuous but is periodically restarted by impacts, with each event lasting only 10 to 20 million years10\text{ to }20\text{ million years} before core-mantle synchronization extinguishes the field.
This establishes the temporal constraints of the dynamo activity according to the second model.
2
Compare the proposed duration of a single dynamo event with the period described in the statement.
The statement describes a rock crystallizing over a 50-million-year50\text{-million-year} period of impact quiescence. This duration (50 million years50\text{ million years}) is significantly longer than the maximum lifespan of a single dynamo event (20 million years20\text{ million years}).
This comparison determines if the magnetic field could physically persist throughout the entire rock formation process without a new impact trigger.
3
Evaluate the validity of the statement based on the comparison.
Since the quiet period exceeds the dynamo's maximum lifespan, the magnetic field would turn off before the rock finished forming, making the statement false.
This leads to the final determination of the true/false value.

Key Concept

Distinguishing between continuous and transient models to make inferences about magnetic field history.
Rate this question