Question

Difficulty: HardEvaluating the Impact of New Evidence

### The Origin of Earth's Water

Scientists debate the origin of Earth’s water and volatile elements. Two main hypotheses have been proposed:

Hypothesis 1
Earth formed in a hot, dry region of the inner solar nebula, inside the "snow line," where water ice could not condense. Consequently, the proto-Earth was completely dry. Earth's water was delivered later during the "Late Veneer" phase, approximately 100 to 300 million years after formation, via impacts of water-rich carbonaceous chondrites and comets from the outer solar system.

Hypothesis 2
Earth's water is endogenous (originating in-situ). During accretion, hydrogen from the solar nebula gas adsorbed directly onto iron-rich silicate dust grains. As these grains clumped to form the early Earth, the hydrogen was trapped inside the mantle. Over time, internal heat and volcanic activity outgassed this water to the surface, forming the oceans.

Suppose researchers discover that primitive, undisturbed rocks from Baffin Island (representing Earth's early mantle before major geological mixing) contain water with a deuterium-to-hydrogen (D/HD/H) ratio that is 25\% lower than the average D/HD/H ratio of carbonaceous chondrites, but closely matches the estimated D/HD/H ratio of the solar nebula gas. Which of the following statements best describes how this new evidence affects the two hypotheses?

  1. A
    It supports Hypothesis 1 and weakens Hypothesis 2, because the low D/HD/H ratio matches the solar nebula gas and differs from that of carbonaceous chondrites.
  2. B
    It weakens both Hypothesis 1 and Hypothesis 2, because Baffin Island rocks should show a mixture of both isotopic signatures to support either hypothesis.
  3. It supports Hypothesis 2 and weakens Hypothesis 1, because the low D/HD/H ratio matches the solar nebula gas and differs from that of carbonaceous chondrites.Answer
  4. D
    It has no effect on either hypothesis, because Baffin Island rocks represent the mantle after core formation, which is unrelated to the source of water.

Answer

The correct answer states that the new evidence supports Hypothesis 2 and weakens Hypothesis 1 because the low deuterium-to-hydrogen ratio matches the solar nebula gas and differs from that of carbonaceous chondrites.
The correct answer states that the new evidence supports Hypothesis 2 and weakens Hypothesis 1. Hypothesis 2 proposes that Earth's water originated from hydrogen adsorbed from the solar nebula gas. Baffin Island rocks, representing primitive early mantle, have a D/HD/H ratio that matches the solar nebula gas, which strongly supports this endogenous model. Conversely, Hypothesis 1 proposes that all water was delivered by carbonaceous chondrites, so a ratio matching the solar nebula and differing from chondrites weakens Hypothesis 1.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the core claims of Hypothesis 1 and Hypothesis 2 regarding the source of Earth's water.
Hypothesis 1 claims water came from outer solar system carbonaceous chondrites and comets. Hypothesis 2 claims water came from solar nebula gas adsorbed onto dust grains during accretion.
This establishes the predicted isotopic signatures for each hypothesis.
2
Analyze the new evidence regarding the D/HD/H ratio in Baffin Island rocks.
The rocks contain water with a D/HD/H ratio 25\% lower than carbonaceous chondrites, but matching the solar nebula gas.
This allows us to match the observed isotopic data to the predictions of the two hypotheses.
3
Determine how the match with the solar nebula gas affects both hypotheses.
A match with the solar nebula gas supports the endogenous origin (Hypothesis 2) and weakens the meteorite delivery model (Hypothesis 1).
This solves the question by evaluating the impact of the new evidence.

Key Concept

Evaluating how isotopic evidence aligns with solar nebular vs. external meteoritic origin hypotheses.
Estimated Time:2m 0s
Rate this question