For decades, Chomskyan generative grammarians asserted that human language is governed by an innate, universal grammar hardwired into the neural circuitry of the brain. According to this paradigm, children acquire language too rapidly and from too impoverished an environment to rely solely on general-purpose cognitive learning. However, cognitive linguists have recently challenged this consensus by utilizing computational models to demonstrate that statistical learning mechanisms can extract complex syntactic patterns from everyday speech. To these researchers, the structure of language emerges organically from communicative interaction, rather than from a pre-existing genetic blueprint. Ultimately, this debate is not merely a technical dispute over syntax, but a fundamental disagreement about the very nature of human cognition.
Based on the passage, which of the following best describes the primary rhetorical function of the final sentence ('Ultimately, this debate...')?
- AIt summarizes the literal scientific consensus regarding the neural circuitry involved in syntax acquisition.
- BIt introduces empirical evidence to resolve the disagreement between the two competing schools of linguistics.
- It elevates the significance of the conflict by framing a specific academic dispute as a fundamental question about human intelligence.Answer
- DIt signals a transition to a new topic by introducing a counterargument against the cognitive linguists' theories.