While nineteenth-century Gothic Revival architects in England sought to restore medieval spiritual values through soaring spires and pointed arches, their contemporary John Ruskin argued that true architecture was inseparable from the moral state of the society that built it. In his treatise *The Stones of Venice*, Ruskin did not merely praise the aesthetics of Gothic buildings; he analyzed the physical marks left by the medieval stonemasons on the blocks. To Ruskin, the unevenness of the hand-carved stone was not a flaw but a testament to the freedom and individuality of the worker, contrasting sharply with the soul-crushing uniformity of modern industrial manufacturing. By focusing on the labor behind the ornament, Ruskin shifted the debate from stylistic imitation to social critique.
What is the primary rhetorical function of the third sentence ('To Ruskin... manufacturing') in the context of the passage as a whole?
- It demonstrates how a physical characteristic of Gothic buildings supports Ruskin's argument regarding the moral condition of laborers.Answer
- BIt details the historical techniques used by medieval stonemasons to shape stone.
- CIt contrasts the durability of hand-carved stone with that of modern industrial materials.
- DIt introduces a concession that hand-carved stones were aesthetically inferior to manufactured ones.