Question

### Passage

Unlocking the Stone Voices: The Decipherment of Maya Hieroglyphs

For nearly a century, the monumental stone inscriptions of the ancient Maya civilization remained one of archaeology's most frustrating puzzles. Scattered across the jungle-shrouded ruins of Mesoamerica, these intricate carvings—depicting stylized faces, animals, and abstract geometric patterns—were long considered indecipherable. Scholars stood divided over whether these glyphs represented a true written language or merely a system of pictograms and religious symbols. The resolution of this long-standing academic debate is now celebrated as one of the greatest intellectual triumphs of the twentieth century, bridging the disciplines of linguistics, anthropology, and art history. Ultimately, the decipherment of Maya hieroglyphs was achieved not by treating the glyphs as mystical symbols, but by demonstrating that the writing system is a complex, phonetic-based script that directly records the spoken Maya language. This realization transformed our understanding of ancient Mesoamerican history, transforming silent monuments into detailed historical records.

The path to this discovery was long obstructed by a dominant academic dogma. For the first half of the twentieth century, the field of Maya studies was dominated by the British archaeologist J. Eric S. Thompson. Thompson argued forcefully that the glyphs did not represent a spoken language at all. Instead, he proposed that the writing system was purely ideographic, conveying abstract cosmological, astronomical, and calendrical ideas. According to Thompson’s view, the Maya were a peaceful, time-obsessed people whose priests carved complex calculations and mystical symbols on stone stelae to contemplate the passage of time. Because of Thompson’s immense scholarly authority, his hypothesis that the glyphs lacked phonetic elements became the established consensus, effectively discouraging young researchers from looking for grammatical patterns or phonetic elements in the stone inscriptions for decades.

The consensus began to crack in the 1950s due to the work of Yuri Knorozov, a Soviet linguist who approached the problem from outside the mainstream archaeological establishment. Knorozov analyzed the sixteenth-century manuscript of Bishop Diego de Landa, which contained a flawed attempt at a Maya "alphabet." While previous scholars had dismissed Landa’s alphabet as useless, Knorozov realized that Landa had asked Spanish questions and received Maya phonetic responses. Knorozov proposed that Maya writing was not alphabetic or purely ideographic, but logosyllabic—combining signs representing whole words with signs representing individual syllables. By matching glyphs in surviving Maya codices to words in modern Mayan languages, Knorozov demonstrated that glyphs could be spelled out phonetically. This discovery established that the script functioned by representing the sounds of spoken language, offering a systematic key to translation that challenged the foundation of established Mayanist scholarship.

While Knorozov focused on the linguistic mechanics of the script, Tatiana Proskouriakoff, a Russian-American artist and archaeologist, uncovered its historical content. Examining the stelae at the site of Piedras Negras, Proskouriakoff noticed that the monuments were dedicated in regular patterns, typically spanning the length of a human lifetime. She identified recurring glyphs associated with specific, repeated dates, which she hypothesized corresponded to key milestones in a ruler's life. Proskouriakoff proved that certain glyphs consistently represented historical events such as the birth, accession to the throne, and death of individual monarchs. Her groundbreaking paper in 1960 shattered the myth of the Maya as abstract, time-worshiping philosophers. Instead, it showed that the stelae were historical records of royal dynasties, detailing wars, alliances, and lines of succession.

In the late twentieth century, the insights of Knorozov and Proskouriakoff converged, leading to a rapid acceleration in decipherment. A new generation of epigraphers and linguists began to collaborate, treating the glyphs as a dynamic written grammar. They recognized that the inscriptions followed a strict Verb-Object-Subject word order, typical of Mayan languages, and utilized prefixes and suffixes to indicate tense and possession. By combining Knorozov’s phonetic syllabary with Proskouriakoff’s historical framework, scholars began to read the inscriptions aloud in the Ch’olan Mayan language. Today, over eighty percent of Maya glyphs can be read, revealing a vivid history of political intrigue, ritual warfare, and artistic patronage. This collaborative synthesis allowed scholars to reconstruct the precise grammar of the inscriptions, proving that the ancient Maya recorded their history with the same linguistic sophistication as any Old World civilization.

***

Based on the passage, match each of the specified paragraphs to the explicit sub-main idea that it conveys.