While early cartographers are often celebrated for their attempts at geographic precision, their maps served a secondary, less objective purpose. The prominent inclusion of mythical sea beasts in unexplored regions of the ocean was not merely a decorative choice or a symptom of ignorance. Rather, these illustrations functioned as political markers of territorial sovereignty and imperial ambition. By populating the uncharted waters with fearsome monsters, cartographers visually signaled the extreme danger and high stakes of maritime exploration, thereby legitimizing the state-sponsored monopolies granted to national trade fleets. The beasts did not represent what was known to be in the water, but rather warned rivals of what the crown claimed the right to conquer.
Based on the passage, what is the primary rhetorical function of the second sentence ("The prominent... ignorance")?
- It identifies two common assumptions about map illustrations in order to reject them and introduce the author's thesis about their political utility.Answer
- BIt provides historical proof that early cartographers lacked the scientific tools to distinguish between myth and reality when drafting maps.
- CIt serves as a transition that shifts the focus of the passage from state-sponsored trade monopolies to the artistic preferences of European monarchs.
- DIt offers a concession acknowledging that decorative aesthetics were ultimately more valuable to mapmakers than geographic accuracy.