Question

Difficulty: EasyMeeting Specific Rhetorical Goals

Chef Marcus Samuelsson is known for fusing diverse culinary traditions to create unique dishes. In his signature restaurant, he blends ingredients from his Swedish upbringing with flavors from East Africa. [1]

The writer wants to add a sentence at point [1] that provides a specific example of a dish that represents this fusion of Swedish and East African cultures. Which choice best accomplishes this goal?

  1. For instance, he serves Swedish meatballs seasoned with berbere, a spicy Ethiopian blend.Answer
  2. B
    His restaurant menu has received numerous accolades from local food critics and international travel guides alike.
  3. C
    Traditional Swedish cuisine often relies on ingredients such as root vegetables, fresh fish, and preserved dill.
  4. D
    Consequently, many younger cooks began to copy his style, they hoped to replicate his international success.

Answer

For instance, he serves Swedish meatballs seasoned with berbere, a spicy Ethiopian blend.
The correct option is the sentence that details serving Swedish meatballs seasoned with berbere, a spicy Ethiopian blend. This choice directly satisfies the writer's goal by naming a specific dish and illustrating the fusion of Swedish and East African cultures.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the prompt to identify the specific rhetorical goal.
The goal is to find a sentence that provides a specific example of a dish that fuses Swedish and East African culinary traditions.
Understanding the precise criteria of the prompt is essential for eliminating options that are grammatically correct but topically irrelevant.
2
Evaluate the choices to check if they describe a specific dish with fusion elements.
The option proposing Swedish meatballs seasoned with berbere is the only choice that names a specific dish and explicitly combines elements from both Swedish and East African (Ethiopian) cooking.
This directly fulfills the requested rhetorical criteria.
3
Identify grammatical and rhetorical issues in the distractors.
The options discussing menu accolades and traditional Swedish ingredients are grammatically correct but fail the rhetorical goal. The option mentioning younger cooks is both a rhetorical mismatch and a comma splice.
Verifying the distractors ensures that the correct answer is the unique and grammatically sound choice that meets the goal.

Key Concept

Meeting Specific Rhetorical Goals
Rate this question