Question

Difficulty: MediumDistinguishing Main Ideas from Supporting Details

Passage

Tardigrades, microscopic eight-legged animals often called water bears, are famous for their ability to survive in environments that would instantly kill almost any other form of life. When faced with extreme conditions, such as freezing temperatures, intense radiation, or the vacuum of space, they enter a state called cryptobiosis. During cryptobiosis, tardigrades expel up to 99 percent of the water from their bodies, coil their heads and legs inward to form a tiny, dry sphere known as a "tun," and suspend their metabolic activity to near-zero levels. They can remain in this state for decades, only to revive within hours when rehydrated. Historically, scientists viewed life as a continuous chemical process. However, the tardigrade’s ability to completely pause its metabolism and successfully restart it suggests that life does not require active chemical reactions to persist. Instead, life can exist as a structural blueprint that can be temporarily deactivated and preserved. Thus, tardigrades do not merely showcase extreme adaptation; they fundamentally challenge biological definitions of what it means to be alive.

Which statement best summarizes the author's primary argument in the passage?

  1. A
    Tardigrades protect themselves from extreme conditions by expelling most of their body water and coiling into a protective sphere called a tun.
  2. The tardigrade's ability to suspend and restart its metabolism forces scientists to reconsider the fundamental definition of life.Answer
  3. C
    Microscopic organisms possess diverse biological mechanisms that allow them to adapt to any environment in the universe.
  4. D
    Tardigrades are the only organisms that can survive extreme radiation and the vacuum of space without experiencing cellular damage.

Answer

The tardigrade's ability to suspend and restart its metabolism forces scientists to reconsider the fundamental definition of life.
The correct answer is the statement focusing on how metabolic suspension forces scientists to reconsider the definition of life. The passage builds up to this argument, stating that the tardigrade's survival suggests life does not require active chemical reactions to persist, thus challenging biological definitions of being alive.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the passage to locate the author's primary claim.
The author introduces the tardigrade's survival methods but concludes that these methods 'fundamentally challenge biological definitions of what it means to be alive' by showing that life can exist without active chemical processes.
Distinguishing the final conclusion from the introductory details helps identify the central argument.
2
Identify and eliminate options that represent supporting details rather than the main idea.
The detail about forming a tun describes the physical process of cryptobiosis but does not encapsulate the author's broader point about redefining life.
Factual details from the text are often used as distractors to test if a reader can distinguish details from the main thesis.
3
Evaluate the remaining options for scope and accuracy.
The option concerning all microscopic organisms is too broad, and the option claiming tardigrades are the only survivors is unsupported. The option regarding the redefinition of life is accurate and encompasses the whole passage.
This confirms the correct choice by ensuring it is directly supported by the text and is of appropriate scope.

Key Concept

Distinguishing Main Ideas from Supporting Details
Estimated Time:1m 30s
Rate this question