Astronomers detected a spectral line at in the atmosphere of Venus, which they attribute to phosphine () at a concentration of approximately (parts per billion). Three hypotheses were proposed to explain this observation.
*Hypothesis 1*
Phosphine is produced by biological activity. Anaerobic microorganisms living in the Venusian cloud decks generate as a metabolic byproduct, similar to certain microbial life forms on Earth.
*Hypothesis 2*
Phosphine is produced by abiotic volcanism. Active volcanoes on Venus eject phosphide minerals from the mantle. These minerals are carried into the atmosphere, where they react with sulfuric acid droplets to produce gas.
*Hypothesis 3*
The detection is a data processing artifact. The spectral line at was actually caused by sulfur dioxide (), which is highly abundant in the Venusian atmosphere. The line was mistaken for due to noise-reduction filtering of the radio telescope data.
Suppose a new study finds that is rapidly destroyed in the Venusian atmosphere by ultraviolet radiation and acid reactions, requiring a continuous replenishment rate of to maintain a concentration of . The study also calculates that Venusian volcanic activity can release at most of phosphorus-containing gases. Based on the hypotheses presented, how does this new evidence affect the validity of Hypothesis 2?
- It weakens Hypothesis 2, because the maximum rate of volcanic phosphorus release is far lower than the rate required to maintain the observed phosphine concentration.Answer
- BIt supports Hypothesis 2, because it confirms that volcanic eruptions actively release phosphorus-containing gases that can react to form phosphine.
- CIt weakens Hypothesis 2, because the rapid destruction of phosphine in the clouds prevents volcanic gases from rising high enough to be detected.
- DIt has no effect on Hypothesis 2, because the rate of phosphine destruction in the clouds is independent of the rate at which volcanic gases are released from the surface.