Question

Difficulty: MediumDirect and Inverse Proportionality

A group of students conducted a series of trials to study the interference patterns of light using a double-slit setup. They measured the fringe spacing, ww (the distance between adjacent bright bands on a screen). The relationship between the fringe spacing and the experimental parameters is given by:

w=λLdw = \frac{\lambda L}{d}

where λ\lambda is the wavelength of the light source, LL is the distance from the slits to the screen, and dd is the distance between the two slits.

Match each change in the experimental setup to its corresponding effect on the fringe spacing (ww).

  • Doubling the slit separation (dd) while keeping all other variables constant.The fringe spacing (ww) is halved because of an inverse proportionality.
  • Doubling the wavelength of the light (λ\lambda) while keeping all other variables constant.The fringe spacing (ww) is doubled because of a direct proportionality.
  • Doubling both the slit separation (dd) and the distance to the screen (LL) simultaneously.The fringe spacing (ww) remains unchanged because the direct and inverse proportionalities cancel each other out.

Answer

To solve this, match the physical changes to their mathematical consequences: doubling the slit separation (dd) halves the fringe spacing (ww); doubling the wavelength (λ\lambda) doubles the fringe spacing (ww); and doubling both the slit separation (dd) and the distance to the screen (LL) keeps the fringe spacing (ww) unchanged.
The correct matches are based on the algebraic relationship w=λLdw = \frac{\lambda L}{d}. Doubling a variable in the numerator (λ\lambda) doubles the value of ww due to direct proportionality. Doubling a variable in the denominator (dd) halves the value of ww due to inverse proportionality. Doubling both simultaneously cancels the changes out (22=1\frac{2}{2} = 1), keeping ww constant.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the proportional relationships for each variable in the equation w=λLdw = \frac{\lambda L}{d}.
ww is directly proportional to λ\lambda and LL, and inversely proportional to dd.
This allows us to determine how changing each variable independently affects the value of ww.
2
Analyze the effect of doubling the slit separation (dd).
w=λL2d=12ww' = \frac{\lambda L}{2d} = \frac{1}{2}w.
Because ww is inversely proportional to dd, doubling dd must result in halving ww.
3
Analyze the effect of doubling the wavelength (λ\lambda).
w=2λLd=2ww' = \frac{2\lambda L}{d} = 2w.
Because ww is directly proportional to λ\lambda, doubling λ\lambda must result in doubling ww.
4
Analyze the effect of simultaneously doubling the slit separation (dd) and the screen distance (LL).
w=λ(2L)2d=22w=ww' = \frac{\lambda (2L)}{2d} = \frac{2}{2}w = w.
The direct proportionality factor of 2 from LL and the inverse proportionality factor of 2 from dd cancel each other out, leaving the fringe spacing unchanged.

Key Concept

Direct and inverse proportionality in algebraic equations
Estimated Time:1m 30s
Rate this question