Question

Difficulty: EasyDistinguishing Main Ideas from Supporting Details

In December 1938, Marjorie Courtenay-Latimer, a museum curator in South Africa, was inspecting the catch of a local fishing trawler when she noticed an unusual blue fish. The specimen, with its limb-like lobed fins and heavy scales, did not match any modern fish species she had ever seen. Courtenay-Latimer sent a sketch to chemist and amateur ichthyologist J.L.B. Smith, who recognized it as a coelacanth—a primitive fish previously believed to have gone extinct 66 million years ago. This discovery shocked the scientific community, as it challenged established timelines of evolutionary history and provided a living link to the prehistoric past. Over the next several decades, researchers successfully located living populations of coelacanths in deep marine canyons off the coast of East Africa and Indonesia, allowing scientists to study their unique physiology in their natural environment. While early search efforts were slow and costly, modern submersible technology has made observing these elusive "living fossils" much more feasible. Today, the coelacanth serves as a powerful reminder of how much of the deep ocean remains unexplored.

Which of the following statements best summarizes the main idea of the passage?

  1. The discovery of the living coelacanth challenged established scientific timelines and highlighted how much of the deep ocean remains unexplored.Answer
  2. B
    Marjorie Courtenay-Latimer first noticed the unusual blue fish with lobed fins while inspecting a local fishing trawler's catch.
  3. C
    Modern submersible technology has allowed marine researchers to fully map and explore the deepest canyons in the world's oceans.
  4. D
    The coelacanth is the only prehistoric ocean creature that managed to survive the mass extinction event 66 million years ago.

Answer

The discovery of the living coelacanth challenged established scientific timelines and highlighted how much of the deep ocean remains unexplored.
The correct option is correct because it encapsulates the central thesis of the passage: the coelacanth's discovery challenged previous scientific beliefs (that it was extinct) and serves as a broader symbol of the unexplored nature of the deep oceans. This statement synthesizes the details provided about the discovery, the scientific reaction, and the modern perspective presented at the end of the text.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the passage to identify the primary focus and scope of the text.
The text describes the discovery of the coelacanth, its impact on evolutionary science, and its role as a reminder of unexplored oceans.
This establishes the boundaries of what the main idea must cover.
2
Evaluate the choices to distinguish between specific details and the overarching point.
The statement about Courtenay-Latimer inspecting the catch is a specific detail, while the statement about submersibles and the one about being the sole survivor are either unsupported or too broad.
This helps eliminate distractors that focus only on minor facts or make unsupported claims.
3
Select the option that best synthesizes the passage's overall argument and purpose.
The option focusing on the coelacanth's discovery challenging scientific timelines and showing how much of the deep ocean is unexplored aligns perfectly with the entire text.
This option captures the global main idea rather than a local detail.

Key Concept

Distinguishing Main Ideas from Supporting Details
Estimated Time:1m 0s
Rate this question