All practice questions

5556 questions

Question 1061Question

Passage

For over a century, the giant tortoises of the Galápagos Islands have fascinated biologists studying evolutionary adaptation. These massive reptiles, which can weigh up to 500 pounds, have developed distinct shell shapes depending on the environment of their specific island. On wetter islands with abundant low-growing plants, tortoises have dome-shaped shells that keep their necks closer to the ground. On drier islands where food grows higher up, they have 'saddleback' shells with a high arch that allows them to stretch their necks upward to reach tree cacti. *Charles Darwin visited the Galápagos Islands in 1835.* This physical variation directly illustrates how species adapt to their local habitats over generations.

Question

The writer is considering deleting the italicized sentence from the passage. Should the writer make this deletion?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Deleted, because it interrupts the discussion of tortoise shell adaptations with unrelated biographical information.

Answer

Deleted, because it interrupts the discussion of tortoise shell adaptations with unrelated biographical information.
The correct answer states that the sentence should be deleted because it interrupts the discussion of tortoise shell adaptations with unrelated biographical information. The paragraph details how dome-shaped and saddleback shells allow tortoises to feed in different environments. Mentioning the year Darwin visited the islands deviates from this specific biological explanation and disrupts the paragraph's cohesion.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the main focus of the paragraph.
The paragraph describes how giant tortoises on different Galápagos islands have developed distinct shell shapes (dome-shaped vs. saddleback) to adapt to their respective environments.
Understanding the paragraph's central theme is necessary to determine if the proposed sentence contributes to or detracts from that theme.
2
Evaluate the relevance of the italicized sentence to this focus.
The sentence 'Charles Darwin visited the Galápagos Islands in 1835' introduces a historical and biographical detail that does not explain or elaborate on the shell adaptations of the tortoises.
This step determines whether the sentence supports the main idea or functions as an irrelevant digression.
3
Choose the option that correctly identifies that the sentence should be deleted and provides the accurate logical justification.
The option stating that the sentence should be deleted because it interrupts the discussion of tortoise shell adaptations with unrelated biographical information is correct.
This aligns with the rhetorical purpose of maintaining unity and focus within a paragraph.

Key Concept

Evaluating Relevance for Adding or Deleting Content
Question 1062Question

In 1842, Italian mathematician Luigi Menabrea published a paper on Charles Babbage's Analytical Engine. Ada Lovelace undertook the task of translating this French document into English. The memoir, which she expanded with her own notes, became a landmark in computer science.

Which choice most effectively punctuates the underlined portion of the sentence?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: NO CHANGE

Answer

The choice that makes no changes to the underlined portion is correct because the nonessential clause 'which she expanded with her own notes' is correctly punctuated with commas on both sides.
The original sentence correctly identifies the relative clause 'which she expanded with her own notes' as nonessential information. Consequently, it must be enclosed in a pair of commas—one after 'memoir' and another after 'notes'—to separate it from the main independent clause.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify whether the underlined clause is essential (restrictive) or nonessential (nonrestrictive) to the meaning of the sentence.
The clause 'which she expanded with her own notes' provides extra information about 'the memoir' but is not necessary to identify which memoir is being discussed. Therefore, it is a nonessential clause.
Nonessential clauses must be set off from the rest of the sentence using punctuation, typically a pair of commas.
2
Evaluate the options to find the correct punctuation layout for the nonessential clause.
A pair of commas is needed: one before 'which' and one after 'notes'. This matches the original phrasing.
Omitting either comma, using a semicolon instead of a comma, or using the relative pronoun 'that' with commas is grammatically incorrect.

Key Concept

Setting off nonessential and parenthetical elements with a pair of commas
Estimated Time:1m 0s
Question 1063Question

Marie Tharp began transforming raw sonar data collected from the Atlantic Ocean into detailed topographic maps in the early 1950s. At the time, she was barred from research vessels due to her gender, so she relied on her colleague Bruce Heezen to gather the depth measurements. As Tharp meticulously plotted the points, she noticed a massive, V-shaped rift running down the center of the ocean floor. Heezen initially dismissed her findings as 'girl talk,' but Tharp persisted, convinced that this feature was a rift valley that proved the theory of continental drift.

Ultimately, Heezen was convinced after he mapped the epicenters of undersea earthquakes, which aligned perfectly with Tharp's rift valley. [1] Furthermore, they decided to publish a map of their findings in 1977.

Which choice most effectively concludes the passage by highlighting the ultimate success of Tharp's research and its impact on the scientific understanding of Earth's geology?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Their final, collaborative map of the ocean floor provided the first comprehensive visual evidence of plate tectonics, permanently transforming the field of oceanography.

Answer

Their final, collaborative map of the ocean floor provided the first comprehensive visual evidence of plate tectonics, permanently transforming the field of oceanography.
The correct option effectively concludes the passage by linking Tharp's mapping work to the validation of plate tectonics and highlighting its lasting impact on the field of oceanography. It aligns with the chronological progress of the passage and maintains a formal, objective tone without introducing irrelevant external details.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the passage to identify the main thesis and the rhetorical goal of the concluding sentence.
The passage details Marie Tharp's persistent work mapping the ocean floor, which eventually convinced her colleague of the rift valley's existence. The goal is to highlight the ultimate success of her research and its impact on Earth's geology.
Understanding the context and specific prompt instructions is necessary to determine what information the concluding sentence must convey.
2
Evaluate each option for logical alignment with the thesis and compliance with grammatical rules.
The correct option connects the map to plate tectonics (scientific impact) without introducing unsupported details or grammatical errors. Other options introduce irrelevant details, contain a comma splice, or use illogical transitions.
This narrows down the choices to the one that satisfies both the rhetorical goal and grammatical correctness.

Key Concept

Selecting concluding sentences that summarize main ideas and emphasize their significance.
Question 1064Question

The writer wants to arrange the sentences to logically explain the progression of Mary Anderson's invention from identifying the problem to developing and ultimately establishing the solution. Arrange the sentences in the most logical order to achieve this goal.

Drag items to arrange them in the correct order

Show answer & explanation

Answer

The sentences should be ordered: first, the initial observation of the driver clearing sleet; second, the negative consequences of that method; third, the design of the hand-operated wiper; and fourth, the commercial rejection and eventual standard adoption.
The correct order follows a clear chronological and causal progression: first, Anderson observes the driver's problem in 1903; second, she reflects on the negative impacts of this manual clearing method; third, she designs a hand-operated wooden arm as a solution; and fourth, the design moves from initial rejection to standard adoption.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the sentence that introduces the primary setting and the initial problem.
The sentence about Mary Anderson's 1903 trolley ride introduces the setting and the problem of the driver clearing sleet.
A logical narrative paragraph must establish the context and problem before explaining any subsequent reactions or designs.
2
Find the sentence that details the immediate consequences of the identified problem.
The sentence describing how the manual clearing method chilled the passengers and obstructed the view connects directly to the sleet-clearing problem.
This maintains continuity by defining the specific issues that motivated Anderson to brainstorm a safer alternative.
3
Determine which sentence describes the development of the solution.
The sentence detailing her return to Alabama and the design of the hand-operated wooden arm with a rubber blade represents the creation of the solution.
This step logically follows the intention to brainstorm an alternative.
4
Locate the sentence showing the long-term resolution or ultimate outcome.
The sentence explaining that manufacturers initially rejected the patent but eventually made it standard equipment completes the narrative arc.
Historical outcome and future standard adoption naturally conclude the discussion of the invention's progression.

Key Concept

Sentence-level logic and narrative coherence in establishing a chronological progression from problem to solution.
Estimated Time:1m 0s
Question 1065Question

The following paragraphs are from an essay about the historic discovery of a rare fish. To make the essay most logical and cohesive, in what order should the paragraphs be placed?

Drag items to arrange them in the correct order

Show answer & explanation

Answer

The paragraphs should be placed in the order starting with the discovery of the fish in South Africa, followed by the curation and sending of the sketch, then the scientist's identification of the specimen, and ending with the historic impact of the find.
The correct order follows a clear chronological and logical progression: introducing the initial discovery of the fish, attempting to identify the creature and sending a sketch, receiving the sketch and identifying the coelacanth, and finally discussing the modern significance of this discovery.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the introductory paragraph.
The paragraph beginning with 'In December 1938' is the introduction.
It establishes the timeline, key figure, and initial discovery without references to prior information.
2
Trace pronoun and noun references to find the second paragraph.
The paragraph beginning with 'Recognizing that the creature' is second.
It uses 'the creature' to refer back to the 'strange, bright blue fish' and introduces the action of sending a sketch.
3
Follow the sequence of events regarding the sketch.
The paragraph beginning with 'Upon receiving the sketch' is third.
It describes the receipt of the sketch that was sent in the previous paragraph.
4
Find the concluding summary.
The paragraph beginning with 'This dramatic discovery' is fourth.
It summarizes the significance of the event and transitions to the present using the word 'Today'.

Key Concept

Logical paragraph sequencing relies on tracking chronological events, identifying pronoun antecedents, and linking parallel transitions (like sending a sketch and receiving it) to ensure smooth rhetorical cohesion.
Estimated Time:1m 30s
Question 1066Question

Passage Excerpt:

In the early nineteenth century, a Cherokee silversmith named Sequoyah became fascinated by the 'talking leaves'—the written language used by European settlers. Though he could neither read nor write English, Sequoyah spent years developing a writing system for his native Cherokee tongue. He began by drawing pictures to represent words, but this proved too cumbersome, so he ultimately created eighty-five symbols representing distinct syllables. By 1821, his syllabary was complete, allowing the Cherokee Nation to quickly establish its own newspaper, *The Cherokee Phoenix*.

Given that all the choices are factual, which choice best emphasizes the physical effort and determination Sequoyah demonstrated while developing his writing system?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: He spent years painstakingly carving characters into bark and wood, persisting even after his cabin and notes were accidentally burned.

Answer

He spent years painstakingly carving characters into bark and wood, persisting even after his cabin and notes were accidentally burned.
The correct answer details the physical labor of carving characters and the determination shown by continuing his work after a house fire destroyed his notes. This directly matches the rhetorical goal.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the precise rhetorical goal requested in the prompt, which is to emphasize Sequoyah's physical effort and determination.
The correct option must contain specific descriptions of physical labor and perseverance through difficulties.
Clarifying the rhetorical goal allows the elimination of choices that, while factual, address different aspects of the story.
2
Check the grammatical correctness of each choice.
The choice describing his isolation contains a comma splice, joining two independent clauses without a proper conjunction or punctuation, and can be discarded.
ACT English questions require the correct option to be grammatically flawless.
3
Compare the remaining grammatically correct choices against the rhetorical goal.
The option about carving into bark and surviving a cabin fire perfectly highlights both physical labor and determination, unlike the choices describing syllabary evolution or community literacy.
Only one choice specifically aligns with both parts of the requested rhetorical goal.

Key Concept

Meeting Specific Rhetorical Goals
Question 1067Question

The following paragraphs are from an essay about deep-sea hydrothermal vents.

Paragraph 1
In 1977, oceanographers exploring the Galapagos Rift made a discovery that fundamentally altered our understanding of biology. Using the research submersible *Alvin*, they descended more than 8,000 feet below the ocean surface, where water temperatures are near freezing and sunlight never penetrates. There, they found hydrothermal vents spewing mineral-rich, superheated water. Surprisingly, these vents were surrounded by thriving ecosystems of giant tube worms, clams, and crabs.

Paragraph 2
Prior to this expedition, it was widely accepted that all food webs relied on solar energy. [1] Near the vents, however, specialized bacteria generate energy by oxidizing toxic hydrogen sulfide, a process called chemosynthesis. These microbes form the base of a unique food chain, demonstrating that complex life can flourish without any sunlight at all.

Which choice provides the most logical and effective transition from the preceding paragraph?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: NO CHANGE

Answer

NO CHANGE
The correct option is correct because it successfully connects the ecosystems discovered on the expedition (mentioned in the preceding paragraph) to the chemical process that sustains them (introduced in the following paragraph) by contrasting it with the traditional solar-based model.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the relationship between the two paragraphs.
Paragraph 1 describes the discovery of thriving deep-sea ecosystems. Paragraph 2 explains the biological process of chemosynthesis that sustains them. A successful transition must bridge these two points.
This establishes the rhetorical purpose of the transition.
2
Evaluate the choices for grammatical correctness.
The option containing a comma splice is grammatically incorrect. The option with a tense shift ('find' instead of 'found') is also grammatically incorrect.
This allows for the elimination of grammatically flawed options.
3
Determine which grammatically correct choice provides the best transition.
The choice stating that food webs were previously believed to rely on solar energy sets up the explanation of chemosynthesis, whereas the option focusing on adaptations does not.
This selects the option that best fulfills the rhetorical goal.

Key Concept

Selecting transitional sentences that logically bridge paragraphs while maintaining grammatical correctness.
Estimated Time:1m 0s
Question 1068Question

Historically, archives stored early motion pictures on cellulose nitrate film. This material is notoriously unstable, deteriorating into a sticky, acidic powder over time. Worse, nitrate film is highly flammable and can burn rapidly even when submerged in water. [1] Consequently, film archivists must carefully control storage environments to prevent devastating losses.

The writer wants to add a sentence at Point [1] that describes the specific chemical properties or hazards of cellulose nitrate film to emphasize why it is so dangerous. Which choice most effectively accomplishes this goal?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Because it contains its own oxidant, the film can burn without oxygen, producing toxic gases as it combusts.

Answer

Because it contains its own oxidant, the film can burn without oxygen, producing toxic gases as it combusts.
The option stating that the film contains its own oxidant and can burn without oxygen while producing toxic gases is correct because it is grammatically sound and directly describes the chemical properties and hazards of the film.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the rhetorical goal of the prompt.
The goal is to select a sentence that details specific chemical properties or hazards to emphasize the danger of cellulose nitrate film.
Identifying the goal ensures the selected choice is contextually relevant.
2
Evaluate the grammar of each option.
Three options introduce grammatical errors: a comma splice, a dependent clause fragment, and an incorrect semicolon splice.
Any correct choice on the ACT English test must be grammatically correct.
3
Verify that the grammatically correct option satisfies the rhetorical goal.
The option beginning with 'Because it contains its own oxidant' is grammatically correct and describes chemical properties (contains its own oxidant) and hazards (burns without oxygen, produces toxic gases).
This confirms it is the correct answer.

Key Concept

Fulfilling Specific Rhetorical and Writing Goals
Question 1069Question

A student is writing an essay about the invention of the Post-it Note.

[1] In 1968, Spencer Silver, a chemist at 3M, was attempting to develop a super-strong adhesive for the aerospace industry. [2] Instead, he accidentally created a 'low-tack' adhesive that could be easily peeled off surfaces without leaving any residue. [3] Years later, his co-worker Art Fry realized this weak adhesive could be used to keep bookmarks from falling out of his hymnal. [4] This simple concept led to the creation of the Post-it Note, which is now a staple in offices worldwide.

The writer is considering adding the following sentence after Sentence 2:

'Super-strong adhesives are also used in construction to bond heavy building materials together.'

Should the writer make this addition?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: No, because it interrupts the narrative flow by introducing an irrelevant detail about the construction industry.

Answer

No, because it interrupts the narrative flow by introducing an irrelevant detail about the construction industry.
The proposed sentence should not be added because it introduces details about the construction industry that are irrelevant to the paragraph's primary focus on the invention and development of the Post-it Note.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the main focus of the paragraph.
The paragraph describes the accidental invention and development of the Post-it Note from a weak adhesive.
Before deciding whether to add information, you must establish the topic and scope of the passage.
2
Evaluate the relevance of the proposed sentence.
The proposed sentence discusses how super-strong adhesives are used in construction, which is unrelated to the creation of the weak-adhesive Post-it Note.
Determining if the sentence supports the main topic helps decide whether it should be added or not.
3
Select the option that correctly identifies that the sentence should not be added and provides a valid logical justification.
The correct option states that the sentence should not be added because it introduces an irrelevant detail about construction.
This matches the rhetorical goal of keeping the passage focused and cohesive.

Key Concept

Evaluating sentence relevance for addition or deletion decisions based on passage focus.
Estimated Time:1m 0s
Question 1070Question

Paragraph 1

[1] In 1888, inventor George Eastman revolutionized photography by introducing the Kodak camera. [2] Before this landmark invention, taking photos required heavy, complex equipment and a mobile darkroom. [3] Eastman's new device was small, lightweight, and pre-loaded with a roll of flexible paper film. [4] To use it, customers simply took their photos and then mailed the entire camera back to the factory in Rochester, New York.

The writer wants to add the following sentence to the paragraph:

"Once the film was developed there, the company sent back the prints along with the camera, which was reloaded with a new roll of film."

To make the paragraph most logical, where should this sentence be placed?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: after Sentence 4

Answer

after Sentence 4
The sentence describes what happens after the film is sent to a factory for development ('Once the film was developed there...'). The adverb 'there' points directly to the 'factory in Rochester, New York' mentioned in Sentence 4. Additionally, the sequence of events flows chronologically from mailing the camera (Sentence 4) to developing the film and returning the camera (the new sentence).

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the target sentence for logical, temporal, or pronoun clues.
The target sentence contains the phrase 'developed there', which requires a previously mentioned location ('there') and the word 'film'.
Identifying transition markers or relative adverbs is key to determining where a sentence belongs.
2
Scan the paragraph to find where the antecedent for the adverb 'there' is located.
Sentence 4 mentions the 'factory in Rochester, New York', which provides a logical location for 'there'.
Pronouns and adverbs like 'there' must follow their antecedents immediately or closely to maintain clarity.
3
Check the chronological flow of the paragraph with the new sentence inserted.
Inserting the sentence after Sentence 4 completes the sequence: first customers take photos, then they mail the camera to the factory (Sentence 4), and finally the factory develops the film and returns the prints (target sentence).
Verifying chronological flow ensures that the paragraph makes complete sense when read from start to finish.

Key Concept

Sentence Reordering and Placement
Estimated Time:45s
Question 1071Question

In the mid-twentieth century, the design of workspaces underwent a dramatic transformation with the introduction of the "Action Office" system. Developed by Robert Propst in 1964, this layout aimed to increase productivity by providing workers with flexible, customizable components, such as standing desks and movable display shelves. [1] Propst believed that office workers were more creative when they had freedom of movement and visual privacy. Ironically, corporate employers stripped away the system's dynamic elements to maximize space, leading to the birth of the standardized, sterile office cubicles that dominate workspaces today.

The writer is considering adding the following sentence at Point [1]:

"Propst, who held over 120 patents during his career, also designed a timber-harvesting machine and a specialized hospital bed."

Should the writer make this addition here?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: No, because it interrupts the paragraph's focus on the design philosophy and evolution of the Action Office system by introducing unrelated details about Propst's other inventions.

Answer

No, because it interrupts the paragraph's focus on the design philosophy and evolution of the Action Office system by introducing unrelated details about Propst's other inventions.
The correct option is the one stating that the sentence should not be added because it interrupts the paragraph's focus on the Action Office system. The paragraph describes the design philosophy and development of this office workspace layout. Mentioning a timber-harvesting machine and a hospital bed diverges from the specific topic of office design, even though both were designed by the same inventor.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the primary topic and focus of the paragraph.
The paragraph focuses on the creation, goals (flexibility and movement), and ultimate corporate degradation of the Action Office system.
Understanding the main topic is essential to determine whether new information is relevant or distracting.
2
Analyze the proposed sentence to be added.
The proposed sentence discusses Propst's other inventions, specifically a timber-harvesting machine and a hospital bed.
Evaluating the content of the proposed sentence helps determine if it supports or diverges from the main topic.
3
Evaluate the relevance of the proposed sentence to the paragraph's focus and choose the correct option.
Because the other inventions are unrelated to workspace design, adding the sentence introduces a distraction. The correct choice is the option that rejects the addition due to this distraction.
Aligning the logical evaluation with the options ensures the correct choice is selected.

Key Concept

Evaluating relevance when adding or deleting content in a passage.
Question 1072Question

To reconstruct the culinary habits of prehistoric societies, archaeologists analyze ancient pottery shards for chemical residues: lipids, proteins, and complex carbohydrates left behind by long-ago meals.

Which of the following versions of the underlined portion is correct?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: residues: lipids, proteins,

Answer

residues: lipids, proteins,
The correct option is correct because the colon is preceded by an independent clause ('To reconstruct the culinary habits of prehistoric societies, archaeologists analyze ancient pottery shards for chemical residues') and is followed by a list that clarifies the nature of these residues.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the clause preceding the punctuation mark to determine if it is independent.
The clause 'To reconstruct the culinary habits of prehistoric societies, archaeologists analyze ancient pottery shards for chemical residues' has a subject and a verb and forms a complete thought.
A colon must be preceded by a complete independent clause.
2
Examine the grammatical structure of the phrase following the punctuation mark to see if it functions as a list or clarification.
The phrase 'lipids, proteins, and complex carbohydrates left behind by long-ago meals' is a list of noun phrases clarifying the chemical residues.
A colon is the correct punctuation mark to introduce a list that clarifies the noun preceding it.
3
Evaluate the other options to ensure they do not introduce punctuation errors, comma splices, or fragment sentences.
The option containing 'which include:' introduces an incomplete clause before the colon. The option containing 'they are' creates a comma splice. The option starting with 'Since' creates a sentence fragment.
ACT standards require grammatical accuracy and correct punctuation.

Key Concept

A colon must be preceded by an independent clause and can be used to introduce a list, explanation, or definition that clarifies the preceding clause.
Question 1073Question

Tardigrades can survive in the most extreme environments on Earth, including volcanic vents and freezing glaciers. Consequently, they are most commonly found in ordinary, damp settings like mossy bricks and garden soil.

Which choice provides the most logical transition from the preceding sentence?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: However,

Answer

The transition 'However,' is correct because it logically signals the contrast between the extreme conditions tardigrades can survive in and the ordinary environments they usually inhabit.
The correct option is the one stating 'However,'. It correctly signals a contrast between the fact that tardigrades can survive in extreme conditions and the fact that they are most commonly found in ordinary damp environments.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the relationship between the first and second sentences.
The first sentence explains that tardigrades can survive in extreme places like volcanoes and glaciers. The second sentence notes that they are actually most common in normal, wet environments like soil and moss.
Understanding the logic connecting the two thoughts is necessary to select the right transition.
2
Determine the type of transition required.
Since there is a conflict/contrast between their extreme survival abilities and their mundane everyday habitats, a contrast transition is needed.
Selecting the correct logical category narrows down the options.
3
Evaluate the choices to find the contrast transition.
Only 'However,' serves as a contrast transition. 'Consequently' and 'Thus' show cause-and-effect, while 'Furthermore' indicates addition.
This identifies the correct answer.

Key Concept

Sentence-level transition words must reflect the logical relationship (contrast, cause-effect, addition, or illustration) between the ideas they connect.
Estimated Time:45s
Question 1074Question

The following paragraph may or may not be in the most logical order.

[1] For centuries, scholars believed that Mayan hieroglyphs were purely ideographic, representing abstract concepts rather than specific spoken sounds. [2] This consensus began to crumble in the 1950s when Soviet linguist Yuri Knorozov proposed that the glyphs functioned primarily as a phonetic syllabary. [3] His Western peers, however, rejected this hypothesis, dismissing it as politically motivated propaganda. [4] Decades later, art historian Linda Schele built upon this phonetic foundation to reconstruct the dynastic histories inscribed on the ruins of Palenque. [5] Despite this skepticism, Knorozov established the phonetic system that would eventually allow researchers to read the texts aloud.

For the sake of logic and cohesion, Sentence 5 should be placed:

Show answer & explanation

Answer: after Sentence 3.

Answer

after Sentence 3.
Placing Sentence 5 after Sentence 3 creates a logical sequence of events and satisfies grammatical dependencies. The phrase 'this skepticism' at the beginning of Sentence 5 directly references the peers' rejection of Knorozov's hypothesis in Sentence 3. Once Sentence 5 is in this position, it introduces the phonetic system, which then serves as the logical referent for the phrase 'this phonetic foundation' at the beginning of Sentence 4.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze grammatical clues in Sentence 5.
Sentence 5 begins with the phrase 'Despite this skepticism,' which requires a preceding sentence that details skepticism or rejection.
Identifying demonstrative phrases helps locate the logical antecedent in the paragraph.
2
Locate the source of the skepticism in the paragraph.
Sentence 3 describes how Knorozov's Western peers 'rejected this hypothesis, dismissing it as politically motivated propaganda,' which represents the skepticism referred to in Sentence 5.
This establishes that Sentence 5 must follow Sentence 3.
3
Analyze grammatical clues in Sentence 4 to verify the placement.
Sentence 4 begins with 'Decades later' and mentions 'this phonetic foundation.' Placing Sentence 5 (which explains how Knorozov 'established the phonetic system') immediately before Sentence 4 provides the necessary context and antecedent for 'this phonetic foundation.'
Verifying subsequent sentences ensures that the paragraph's cohesive and chronological flow is fully maintained.

Key Concept

Sentence reordering requires identifying cohesive links, such as pronouns, transition phrases, and chronological markers, to ensure ideas flow logically from one sentence to the next.
Estimated Time:1m 15s
Question 1075Question

According to legend, the Chinese emperor Shennong discovered tea in 2737 BCE when wild leaves drifted into his pot of boiling water. He found the resulting brew refreshing and restorative. [1] Consequently, he immediately ordered his court to cultivate the plant throughout his empire.

Refer to the underlined portion marked [1] in the passage. Which of the following choices most effectively establishes the logical relationship between the two sentences?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: NO CHANGE

Answer

The correct choice is 'NO CHANGE', which retains the transition 'Consequently,' to establish the proper cause-and-effect relationship.
The transition 'Consequently' correctly establishes a cause-and-effect relationship because the second sentence describes a direct result of the first: finding the beverage refreshing led the emperor to order its cultivation.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Read the two sentences to identify the relationship between them.
The first sentence states the emperor found the brew refreshing, and the second sentence states he ordered the plant to be cultivated.
Transitions must match the logical flow between ideas.
2
Determine the type of relationship.
Ordering cultivation is a direct result of finding the brew refreshing, meaning the relationship is cause-and-effect.
Cause-and-effect relationships require transition words like 'consequently' or 'therefore'.
3
Compare the options against this relationship.
Only 'NO CHANGE' (Consequently,) correctly shows cause-and-effect, while other choices show contrast, example, or addition.
Selecting the word that accurately represents the logical connection.

Key Concept

Sentence-Level Transitions
Estimated Time:45s
Question 1076Question

The following passage is an excerpt from an essay about modern physics.

Although the standard model of particle physics has successfully predicted the existence of numerous subatomic particles, it fails to account for gravity or dark matter. In addition, physicists have proposed string theory—which conceptualizes particles as vibrating one-dimensional strings rather than zero-dimensional points—to bridge these theoretical gaps.

Which choice most effectively establishes a logical transition between the two sentences?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: To this end,

Answer

The transition 'To this end,' is the correct choice because it logically connects the limitation of the standard model (failing to account for gravity and dark matter) with the purpose of proposing string theory (to bridge these theoretical gaps).
The preceding sentence states that the standard model fails to account for gravity or dark matter, representing theoretical gaps. The second sentence describes the proposal of string theory specifically 'to bridge these theoretical gaps.' Therefore, the transition must convey that the action in the second sentence was taken for the purpose of addressing the problem in the first. The transition 'To this end' means 'for this purpose' or 'with this goal in mind,' which correctly establishes this logical relationship.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the relationship between the two sentences.
The first sentence identifies a problem (the standard model's failure to account for gravity and dark matter), and the second sentence describes an action taken to solve that problem (proposing string theory).
Understanding the logical connection is necessary to choose the appropriate transitional word.
2
Evaluate the meaning and function of each option.
'In addition' suggests addition; 'To this end' suggests purpose or goal-directed action; 'Likewise' suggests similarity; 'Nevertheless' suggests contrast.
Matching the options to the identified relationship ensures the correct logical transition is selected.
3
Select the option that matches the purpose-driven relationship.
'To this end' correctly signals that string theory was proposed for the purpose of bridging the gaps identified in the first sentence.
This choice creates a coherent and logical flow between the two thoughts.

Key Concept

Sentence-level transitions require analyzing the logical relationship between adjacent ideas, such as addition, contrast, cause-and-effect, or purpose, and choosing the word or phrase that accurately reflects that relationship.
Estimated Time:1m 0s
Question 1077Question

[1]
In 1903, during a winter visit to New York City, Mary Anderson observed a trolley driver struggling to see through the freezing sleet. The driver frequently opened the front window to wipe the wet snow off the windshield by hand, exposing the passengers to the cold and delaying the trip. To solve this problem, Anderson sketched a design for a rubber blade attached to a hand-operated lever inside the vehicle. She patented her invention, the windshield wiper, in 1903, but manufacturing companies initially rejected it, believing the device would distract drivers. However, as the automobile industry boomed in the following decades, Anderson's design proved indispensable. [2]

The writer wants to add a concluding sentence after sentence [2] that highlights the long-term impact of Anderson's invention on modern transportation. Which choice best accomplishes this goal?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Ultimately, what began as a simple solution on a snowy trolley ride became a standard safety feature found on almost every vehicle on the road today.

Answer

Ultimately, what began as a simple solution on a snowy trolley ride became a standard safety feature found on almost every vehicle on the road today.
The correct option effectively transitions from the historical narrative of the invention to its long-term impact by stating that it became a standard safety feature on modern vehicles. It remains focused on the main topic, uses a logical transitional word, and is grammatically correct.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the key requirement in the question stem.
The concluding sentence must focus on the long-term impact of the windshield wiper on modern transportation.
This establishes the criteria for evaluating the choices based on content relevance.
2
Evaluate the choices for relevance to the target focus.
The option about the invention becoming a standard safety feature on modern vehicles directly addresses the long-term impact. The option about Anderson's personal finances and return to Alabama introduces new, unrelated details.
This helps eliminate off-topic distractors.
3
Check the remaining choices for grammatical correctness.
The option stating the patent expired contains a comma splice. The option with 'transforms' contains an incorrect tense shift to the present tense, and uses an illogical transition word. The correct option is grammatically sound and fits the context.
This ensures the final selection is free of grammatical errors.

Key Concept

Selecting Concluding Sentences
Question 1078Question

Many cities are replacing traditional streetlights with light-emitting diode (LED) bulbs to save energy. These modern bulbs consume up to 80 percent less electricity than standard sodium vapor lamps. Although LEDs are highly efficient, some residents complain that the cool, blue-white light they emit is too harsh compared to the warm glow of older lights. Sodium vapor lamps were first developed in the 1930s and became popular for street lighting due to their long lifespan. Consequently, some municipalities are adjusting the color temperature of their new LED installations to address these concerns.

The writer is considering deleting the sentence 'Sodium vapor lamps were first developed in the 1930s and became popular for street lighting due to their long lifespan.' from the passage. Should this sentence be kept or deleted?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Deleted, because it interrupts the paragraph's focus on LED streetlights with irrelevant historical information about sodium vapor lamps.

Answer

The correct answer is that the sentence should be deleted because it interrupts the paragraph's focus on LED streetlights with irrelevant historical information about sodium vapor lamps.
The main focus of the paragraph is the modern transition from traditional streetlights to LED bulbs, specifically highlighting energy savings and residents' complaints about the cool color temperature of LEDs. The sentence about the 1930s development and popularity of sodium vapor lamps is a historical tangent that does not contribute to this focus. Therefore, it should be deleted.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the main topic of the paragraph.
The paragraph focuses on the modern transition from sodium vapor streetlights to energy-efficient LED streetlights, including residents' complaints about LED light quality and how municipalities are addressing them.
To determine if a sentence belongs in a paragraph, you must first understand the paragraph's primary focus.
2
Analyze the content and purpose of the sentence proposed for deletion.
The sentence provides historical context about when sodium vapor lamps were developed (the 1930s) and why they were popular (long lifespan).
This helps determine whether the sentence supports the main topic or introduces a distraction.
3
Evaluate whether the sentence contributes to the main topic or should be deleted.
The historical details about sodium vapor lamps are not relevant to the modern transition to LEDs or the discussion of light temperature. The sentence should be deleted because it interrupts the focus of the paragraph.
Off-topic sentences should be removed to maintain paragraph unity and cohesion.

Key Concept

Evaluating the relevance of details to maintain paragraph unity and cohesion
Question 1079Question

For the sake of the logic and cohesion of the paragraph, where should the following sentence be placed?

"This dance communicates both the distance and direction of the food source."

[1] When a honeybee finds a rich source of nectar, it returns to the hive to share this information with other bees. [2] It performs a series of movements known as the "waggle dance" on the honeycomb. [3] The orientation of the bee's body during the dance indicates the direction of the food relative to the sun. [4] In this way, the scout bee successfully recruits its hive mates to harvest the newly discovered flowers.

Show answer & explanation

Answer: before Sentence 3

Answer

before Sentence 3
The correct answer is the option that places the sentence before Sentence 3. Sentence 2 introduces the 'waggle dance,' making the reference to 'This dance' in the target sentence clear and logical. Furthermore, the target sentence states that the dance communicates 'distance and direction,' which sets up the details in Sentence 3 about how the bee's body orientation indicates direction.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the key transition or reference word in the sentence to be placed.
The phrase "This dance" requires a prior sentence that introduces or names the dance.
This helps narrow down where the sentence can logically be inserted after the noun phrase is introduced.
2
Locate where the dance is first introduced in the paragraph.
Sentence 2 introduces the movements as the "waggle dance."
The target sentence must come after Sentence 2 because it refers back to "This dance."
3
Verify if placing the sentence before Sentence 3 maintains a logical progression.
Yes, because Sentence 3 then explains how the direction is indicated, which directly elaborates on the mention of "direction" in the inserted sentence.
This placement creates a cohesive flow from the introduction of the dance, to its general function, to its specific mechanism, and finally to the result.

Key Concept

Sentence Reordering and Placement
Question 1080Question

In the late nineteenth century, bicycle manufacturer Adeline Gray noticed that the heavy wool skirts women were expected to wear made riding both [1] cumbersome and dangerous. Nonetheless, she designed the 'safety skirt,' which used a system of pulleys to raise the fabric away from the wheels.

Which of the following choices best replaces the underlined portion to establish the most logical transition and maintain correct sentence structure?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: cumbersome and dangerous; consequently, she designed

Answer

cumbersome and dangerous; consequently, she designed
The correct option properly uses the cause-and-effect transition 'consequently' to connect the difficulty of riding in heavy skirts with the design of a safety skirt. It uses a semicolon and comma to join the two independent clauses, avoiding a comma splice.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the relationship between the two clauses separated by the transition.
The first clause states that traditional skirts made bicycle riding cumbersome and dangerous. The second clause states that Adeline Gray designed a 'safety skirt' to solve this issue. This is a cause-and-effect relationship.
Understanding the logical connection ensures we choose a transition word that conveys the correct relationship (cause-and-effect rather than contrast).
2
Evaluate the transition words in the options based on the identified relationship.
'Nonetheless' represents contrast (incorrect). 'Consequently' represents cause-and-effect (correct).
Filtering options by the correct transition category eliminates choices that establish the wrong logical relationship.
3
Examine the grammatical structure and punctuation of the remaining options containing the correct transition.
Joining two independent clauses with a conjunctive adverb like 'consequently' requires a semicolon before the transition and a comma after it. Using just a comma creates a comma splice. Using 'so consequently' creates redundant transition overuse.
Punctuation and conciseness rules must be satisfied to ensure the sentence is grammatically correct.

Key Concept

Sentence-Level Transitions
PreviousPage 54 / 278Next
All practice questions — ACT | Examkin