Topic Development

357 questions

Question 321Question

Prior to 1931, maps of the London Underground plotted subway routes geographically, overlaying them onto a standard city map. This method resulted in congested center sections and sprawling, hard-to-read outer lines. An engineering draftsman named Harry Beck realized that passengers riding underground only needed to know the sequence of stations and where to transfer, rather than their exact geographical coordinates. His solution was a diagrammatic layout that resembled an electrical circuit, using only horizontal, vertical, and 45-degree diagonal lines. By ignoring geographical accuracy, Beck created a clean, legible map that became a design classic and the model for transit systems worldwide.

The writer is considering adding the following sentence to the paragraph:

"Beck was temporarily laid off from his job at the Signals Office during a period of staff reductions, though he continued working on the map design in his spare time."

Should the writer make this addition?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: No, because it introduces biographical details that are irrelevant to the paragraph's discussion of the map's design and functionality.

Answer

No, because it introduces biographical details that are irrelevant to the paragraph's discussion of the map's design and functionality.
The correct option correctly states that the sentence should not be added. The paragraph's sole focus is the design transition of the London Underground map from a geographic layout to a clean, schematic design. Adding details about Beck's layoff introduces irrelevant biographical information that distracts from this main point.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the main focus of the paragraph.
The paragraph describes how Harry Beck innovated the London Underground map by replacing a geographically accurate map with a simplified, circuit-like diagram to improve readability for passengers.
Before deciding whether to add or delete a sentence, the writer must establish the central topic and purpose of the paragraph.
2
Evaluate the relevance of the proposed sentence.
The proposed sentence mentions that Beck was temporarily laid off from the Signals Office during staff reductions. While this is a biographical fact about Beck, it does not relate to the visual layout, readability, or design principles of the map.
Every sentence in a well-written paragraph must support the main idea. Irrelevant details should be excluded to maintain unity.
3
Select the option that correctly identifies the decision and provides the correct rhetorical reason.
The correct decision is not to add the sentence ('No') because it introduces irrelevant biographical information, which matches the option explaining that it interrupts the discussion of the map's design and functionality.
Only one option correctly pairs the negative decision with the logical justification of paragraph unity.

Key Concept

Evaluating Relevance for Adding or Deleting Content
Estimated Time:1m 15s
Question 322Question

The following is an excerpt from a draft of an essay about the cosmic microwave background radiation.

[1]
__________________________________________________. In 1964, radio astronomers Arno Penzias and Robert Wilson were troubled by a persistent, low-frequency hum coming from their Holmdel horn antenna in New Jersey. They tried everything to eliminate the noise: pointing the antenna in different directions, cleaning out nesting pigeons, and cooling the receiver to near absolute zero. Yet, the hiss remained constant, day and night. Ultimately, they realized that this background noise was actually the cosmic microwave background radiation—the leftover thermal echo of the Big Bang. Their accidental discovery provided the first definitive observational evidence for the Big Bang theory, transforming our understanding of the universe’s origins.

Which choice best establishes the main topic and serves as an effective introduction to the essay?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: A search for a clean communications channel unexpectedly yielded the most crucial evidence for the origins of our universe.

Answer

The statement that describes a search for a clean communications channel leading to crucial evidence for the origins of the universe is the correct choice.
The statement describing how a search for a clean communications channel led to evidence for the origins of the universe is correct. It is grammatically correct and successfully introduces the dual nature of the passage: the practical context of Penzias and Wilson's research and the ultimate scientific breakthrough concerning the Big Bang.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the passage to determine its main focus and theme.
The passage discusses how Arno Penzias and Robert Wilson accidentally discovered cosmic microwave background radiation (the thermal echo of the Big Bang) while trying to clean up radio noise on their antenna.
An effective introduction must establish the main topic, linking the search for clean radio communications to the monumental cosmological discovery.
2
Evaluate the grammar and structure of each option to eliminate grammatically incorrect options.
One option contains a comma splice, and another is a sentence fragment. These are eliminated from contention.
ACT English questions require the correct choice to be grammatically correct.
3
Compare the remaining grammatically correct options for relevance and scope.
The option about antenna maintenance is too narrow and misses the main point of the essay. The option linking the clean communications channel search to the origins of the universe sets up the narrative and thesis perfectly.
The correct introduction must match the rhetorical goal of the passage as a whole.

Key Concept

Establishing Introductions and Thesis Statements
Question 323Question

Passage Excerpt:

In 1957, engineers Alfred Fielding and Marc Chavannes sealed two textured plastic sheets together, trapping pocketed air bubbles between them. The inventors initially hoped to market this novel material as a stylish, modern wallpaper. [1] It was not until 1960, when IBM began shipping its fragile new computers, that the material—rebranded as Bubble Wrap—found its true purpose as protective packaging.

Question:

The writer wants to add a sentence at Point [1] that highlights the contrast between the inventors' initial enthusiasm and the public's disappointing response to the wallpaper concept. Which choice best accomplishes this goal?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Although they were convinced that homeowners would embrace the three-dimensional design, consumers found the plastic sheets strange and completely unappealing.

Answer

The correct option is the sentence stating that although the inventors were convinced homeowners would embrace the three-dimensional design, consumers found the plastic sheets strange and completely unappealing.
The option beginning with 'Although they were convinced' is correct because it is grammatically correct and directly contrasts the inventors' excitement ('convinced that homeowners would embrace') with the public's negative reception ('consumers found the plastic sheets strange and completely unappealing').

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the prompt's specific rhetorical goal.
The goal is to introduce a sentence that contrasts the inventors' excitement/enthusiasm with the public's disappointing/negative response.
Identifying the target criteria allows for systematic elimination of options that do not address the required contrast.
2
Examine the options for grammatical errors.
The option containing 'however' joined by commas creates a comma splice, making it grammatically incorrect.
Any option chosen in the ACT English section must be grammatically sound.
3
Evaluate the remaining grammatically correct options against the rhetorical goal.
The option beginning with 'Although they were convinced' contrasts the expectation ('convinced that homeowners would embrace') with the reality ('strange and completely unappealing'), fulfilling the goal.
The other choices focus on manufacturing, patenting, or material details, failing the rhetorical criteria.

Key Concept

Meeting Specific Rhetorical Goals
Question 324Question

In 1957, engineers Alfred Fielding and Marc Chavannes sealed two plastic shower curtains together, trapping a grid of air bubbles in between. Initially, they attempted to market this textured material as a new type of wallpaper. [1] When that venture failed, they pitched the material as greenhouse insulation, which also met with little success. The breakthrough came in 1960, when IBM needed a reliable packaging material to protect its new computer during transit, prompting the inventors to brand their creation as Bubble Wrap.

The writer is considering adding the following sentence at Point [1]:

"Fielding and Chavannes both held advanced degrees in engineering."

Should the writer make this addition?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: No, because it interrupts the paragraph's focus on the various marketing attempts for the new material.

Answer

The writer should not make the addition because the sentence about the inventors' academic degrees interrupts the paragraph's focus on the marketing and applications of the invention.
The correct option is the one stating that the writer should not add the sentence because it interrupts the paragraph's focus on the various marketing attempts. The paragraph describes the sequence of marketing attempts for Bubble Wrap (as wallpaper, greenhouse insulation, and packaging). Details about the inventors' academic degrees are biographical and irrelevant to this specific narrative flow.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the main focus of the paragraph.
The paragraph describes the development of a textured plastic material (Bubble Wrap) and the chronological sequence of attempts to market it (as wallpaper, then greenhouse insulation, and finally as packaging material).
Understanding the paragraph's theme is necessary to evaluate if the proposed sentence contributes to that theme.
2
Analyze the content of the proposed sentence.
The proposed sentence ("Fielding and Chavannes both held advanced degrees in engineering.") introduces biographical details about the inventors' educational qualifications.
Determining what information the new sentence introduces helps assess its relevance to the surrounding context.
3
Evaluate whether the biographical details support or disrupt the focus of the paragraph.
The biographical details about their degrees do not contribute to the narrative of how the material was marketed. Therefore, the sentence should not be added because it interrupts the paragraph's focus.
We must select the choice that correctly states the decision to omit the sentence and provides the correct rhetorical reason.

Key Concept

Evaluating Relevance for Adding or Deleting Content
Question 325Question

Passage Excerpt:

In 1843, mathematician Ada Lovelace published her extensive notes on Charles Babbage's proposed Analytical Engine. Lovelace’s notes contained what many historians consider to be the very first computer program: [underlined]an algorithm designed to calculate Bernoulli numbers[/underlined]. Despite the engine never being built, Lovelace’s vision was remarkably forward-thinking.

Question:
Which choice most effectively emphasizes the complexity and meticulous nature of Lovelace's programming work?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: a highly detailed, algebraic sequence of instructions written to calculate complex Bernoulli numbers

Answer

The choice describing the program as 'a highly detailed, algebraic sequence of instructions written to calculate complex Bernoulli numbers' is correct.
The correct choice is the option that describes the program as 'a highly detailed, algebraic sequence of instructions written to calculate complex Bernoulli numbers.' This choice is grammatically correct and uses terms such as 'highly detailed,' 'algebraic sequence,' and 'complex Bernoulli numbers' to directly highlight the complexity and meticulous nature of Lovelace's work.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the rhetorical goal specified in the question.
The goal is to emphasize the complexity and meticulous nature of Lovelace's programming work.
Understanding the specific rhetorical goal is required to evaluate which choice best satisfies the prompt.
2
Analyze each option for grammatical correctness and sentence structure.
The option containing 'a detailed sequence of instructions, it calculated Bernoulli numbers' is a comma splice, making it grammatically incorrect.
Eliminating grammatically incorrect choices helps narrow down the viable options.
3
Evaluate the remaining grammatically correct options based on their word choice and ability to convey complexity.
The choices describing a 'simple formula' and a 'standard mathematical formula' fail to convey complexity, whereas the correct choice uses terms like 'highly detailed,' 'algebraic sequence,' and 'complex' to meet the goal.
Comparing the specific connotations of the grammatically correct options identifies the one that best achieves the rhetorical purpose.

Key Concept

Meeting Specific Rhetorical Goals
Question 326Question

A writer is editing a passage about early computer science and has drafted the following paragraph:

In the early 1950s, computer pioneer Grace Hopper worked on the UNIVAC I, one of the first commercial computers. At the time, programming required writing tedious machine code, which consisted entirely of numbers. Hopper believed that programming could be simplified if programmers could write instructions in English-like statements. This led her to develop the A-0 compiler, a groundbreaking program that translated mathematical code into machine-readable instructions. [5] Computer manufacturers in the mid-twentieth century were highly competitive, seeking to secure lucrative government contracts. Although her colleagues were initially skeptical of her idea, Hopper's innovation laid the foundation for modern programming languages.

The writer is considering deleting Sentence 5 from the paragraph. Should this sentence be deleted?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Yes, because it interrupts the paragraph's focus on Hopper's development of the compiler with irrelevant information about competition among manufacturers.

Answer

The sentence should be deleted because it interrupts the paragraph's focus on Hopper's development of the compiler with irrelevant details about manufacturer competition.
The option suggesting the sentence be deleted because it interrupts the focus on Hopper's compiler with details about manufacturer competition is correct. Sentence 5 shifts the focus from Hopper's programming innovation to industry business practices, making it irrelevant.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the main topic and focus of the paragraph.
The paragraph focuses on Grace Hopper's work on the UNIVAC I and her development of the A-0 compiler to make programming easier.
To establish a baseline of relevance for any sentence in the paragraph.
2
Evaluate the content of Sentence 5.
Sentence 5 discusses the competitiveness of computer manufacturers in the mid-twentieth century and their pursuit of government contracts.
To determine if the sentence aligns with the paragraph's main focus.
3
Determine whether the sentence should be kept or deleted, and select the correct explanation.
The sentence is irrelevant to Hopper's compiler development and should be deleted because it interrupts the paragraph's flow. The correct option is the one stating that it should be deleted because it interrupts the focus with irrelevant details about manufacturer competition.
To match the correct decision with the accurate rhetorical reasoning.

Key Concept

Evaluating Relevance for Adding or Deleting Content
Question 327Question

In the early nineteenth century, a Cherokee silversmith named Sequoyah became convinced that written communication was the key to his people’s long-term independence. Despite widespread skepticism from his community, he spent years developing a written language. Initially, Sequoyah attempted to create a unique pictograph for every word in the Cherokee language. However, this approach proved impractical due to the thousands of distinct symbols required. Realizing that spoken words could be broken down into repeating sounds, he abandoned pictographs and instead designed a syllabary of eighty-five characters representing all the consonant-vowel combinations in the language.

The writer is considering adding the following sentence to the end of the paragraph:

"Within a few years of the syllabary’s completion, the Cherokee Nation established a bilingual newspaper and achieved a literacy rate higher than that of neighboring communities."

Should the writer make this addition?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Yes, because it illustrates the successful implementation and impact of the writing system Sequoyah developed.

Answer

Yes, because it illustrates the successful implementation and impact of the writing system Sequoyah developed.
The correct answer is correct because the proposed sentence demonstrates the direct, successful outcome of Sequoyah's efforts to establish a writing system, directly supporting the paragraph's opening assertion that written communication was the key to Cherokee independence.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the main focus and theme of the paragraph.
The paragraph describes Sequoyah's goal to develop a written language to help Cherokee independence, his process, and his final success in creating an eighty-five-character syllabary.
To evaluate relevance, you must first understand the purpose and scope of the existing text.
2
Evaluate the proposed sentence for relevance to this focus.
The proposed sentence states that the syllabary's completion led to a bilingual newspaper and higher literacy rates for the Cherokee Nation.
This step determines whether the sentence contributes logically to the paragraph's theme or introduces an unnecessary distraction.
3
Assess the rhetorical impact of adding the sentence.
The addition shows the real-world success of Sequoyah's invention, validating the opening assertion that written communication was key to the nation's independence. Therefore, it should be added, and the correct option must state 'Yes' with this justification.
This final step connects the decision to the correct pedagogical justification.

Key Concept

Evaluating Relevance for Adding or Deleting Content
Question 328Question

Passage Excerpt:

The Svalbard Global Seed Vault is located deep within a mountain on a remote Arctic island. [1] The facility secures millions of crop seeds from around the world, safeguarding global biodiversity against catastrophic loss.

The writer wants to add a phrase at the beginning of the second sentence (replacing '[1]') to highlight the vault's geological stability and natural security. Which choice best accomplishes this goal?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Carved into solid sandstone and surrounded by permafrost,

Answer

Carved into solid sandstone and surrounded by permafrost,
The correct choice successfully addresses the rhetorical goal by emphasizing the solid sandstone (geological stability) and permafrost (natural security) of the vault's location. Grammatically, it functions as a correct introductory participial modifier for the main clause.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the prompt to identify the specific rhetorical goal.
The goal is to highlight the vault's 'geological stability' and 'natural security.'
Understanding the specific rhetorical criteria is necessary to filter out choices that do not focus on these details.
2
Evaluate the choices based on the rhetorical goal.
Only the correct option and the comma splice option mention sandstone (geological stability) and permafrost (natural security). The option containing the construction date and financial details is irrelevant to the goal.
This narrows the options down to those that satisfy the content requirements of the prompt.
3
Examine the remaining options for grammatical correctness.
The option containing the mountain clause is a comma splice, and the option separating 'that' with a comma is a punctuation error. The correct option is grammatically sound.
ACT English questions require the selected choice to be both rhetorically effective and grammatically correct.

Key Concept

Meeting Specific Rhetorical Goals
Estimated Time:1m 0s
Question 329Question

Passage Excerpt:

In 1931, Harry Beck, a temporary draftsman for the London Underground, designed a revolutionary schematic diagram of the transit system. Rather than attempting to show geographical accuracy, Beck created a map that resembled a simplified circuit diagram, with straight lines and clean angles. [1] This design prioritized clarity and utility for commuters navigating the growing network.

The writer wants to add a sentence at Point [1] that provides a specific, concrete detail illustrating how Beck's map simplified the actual geography of London for commuters. Which choice best accomplishes this goal?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: He represented the winding Thames River as a simple horizontal line and spaced the central stations evenly, despite their actual geographic proximity.

Answer

The correct answer is the option that describes representing the Thames River as a simple horizontal line and spacing the central stations evenly.
The correct option directly satisfies the rhetorical goal by providing specific design elements (representing the Thames River as a simple horizontal line and spacing central stations evenly) that illustrate how the map simplified London's geography for passengers.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the prompt to identify the specific rhetorical goal.
The goal is to provide a specific, concrete detail illustrating how Beck's map simplified London's actual geography.
This establishes the criteria for evaluating the choices.
2
Evaluate the choices against the identified rhetorical goal.
The options discussing the map's success or Beck's working hours fail to provide details of geographical simplification. The remaining options describe geographical changes.
This eliminates options that are off-topic or fail to meet the rhetorical criteria.
3
Examine the remaining options for grammatical correctness.
The option that joins the two details with a comma splice is grammatically incorrect. The option that describes representing the Thames as a simple horizontal line and spacing stations evenly is grammatically correct and fully satisfies the goal.
This ensures the final choice meets both rhetorical and grammatical standards.

Key Concept

Meeting Specific Rhetorical Goals
Estimated Time:1m 0s
Question 330Question

A writer is editing a passage about the history of eating utensils and has drafted the following paragraph:

For centuries, Western Europeans ate their meals using only knives, spoons, and their fingers. When the Byzantine princess Maria Argyropoulina arrived in Venice in 1004 to marry the Doge's son, she brought with her a set of golden, two-pronged forks, which she used to eat her food. [1] The Venetian clergy, however, condemned the implement as an insult to God, declaring that human hands were the only tools fit to touch the food created by the heavens. Consequently, forks did not gain widespread acceptance in Italy for another several centuries.

The writer is considering adding the following sentence at Point [1]:

Princess Maria was also known for her elaborate silk gowns and gold jewelry.

Should the writer make this addition at Point [1]?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: No, because it interrupts the paragraph's discussion of the fork's introduction to Venice with irrelevant personal details about the princess.

Answer

No, because it interrupts the paragraph's discussion of the fork's introduction to Venice with irrelevant personal details about the princess.
The correct option correctly identifies that the sentence should not be added because it introduces irrelevant details about Princess Maria's attire and jewelry. This information departs from the paragraph's central focus, which is the introduction of the fork and the controversy surrounding it.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the main topic and focus of the paragraph.
The paragraph focuses on the introduction of the fork to Venice by Princess Maria, the Venetian clergy's negative reaction to the utensil, and the resulting delay in its acceptance.
Establishing the paragraph's main theme is necessary to evaluate if the proposed sentence is relevant.
2
Evaluate the content of the proposed sentence.
The proposed sentence discusses Princess Maria's clothing (silk gowns) and personal accessories (gold jewelry).
Determining what the proposed sentence is about allows us to compare it to the main topic of the paragraph.
3
Compare the proposed sentence with the paragraph's focus to determine if it should be added.
The details about the princess's gowns and jewelry are irrelevant to the history of the fork and disrupt the flow of the paragraph, so the sentence should not be added.
This comparison provides both the correct decision (No) and the correct justification (it interrupts the discussion with irrelevant details).

Key Concept

Evaluating Relevance for Adding or Deleting Content
Estimated Time:1m 30s
Question 331Question

Passage Excerpt:
In response to the growing national highway system, graphic designers developed FHWA Series fonts. These sans-serif typefaces were specifically engineered to improve legibility for drivers traveling at high speeds. [1]

The writer wants to add a sentence at Point [1] that provides a specific, concrete illustration of how the design of the characters achieved maximum readability. Which choice best accomplishes this goal?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: The characters featured wide counters—the open spaces inside letters like *o* and *b*—which prevented the letters from appearing as solid blobs from a distance.

Answer

The choice that describes characters featuring wide counters to prevent letters from appearing as solid blobs.
The correct option describes the characters' wide counters and explains how this design element keeps letters distinct at a distance, directly fulfilling the rhetorical goal of illustrating how the design achieved legibility.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the specific rhetorical goal requested in the prompt.
The prompt requires a sentence that provides a specific, concrete illustration of how the design of the characters achieved readability.
Understanding the precise prompt criteria allows for accurate evaluation of the choices.
2
Evaluate the choices to see which one details design elements of the characters (such as shape, spacing, or strokes) that directly aid legibility.
The choice detailing the wide counters inside letters is the only one that focuses on character design elements.
This matches the rhetorical goal of showing how design achieved legibility.
3
Check the selected choice for grammatical correctness.
The correct choice is grammatically sound, whereas other choices either fail the rhetorical goal or contain grammatical errors like comma splices.
The correct option must be both grammatically correct and rhetorically appropriate.

Key Concept

Meeting Specific Rhetorical Goals
Estimated Time:1m 0s
Question 332Question

The following is a paragraph from an essay about the origin of the word "silhouette":

In mid-eighteenth-century France, traditional painted portraits were a luxury reserved solely for the wealthy aristocracy. For the emerging middle class, a much cheaper alternative arose: the profile portrait, created by tracing the shadow of a subject’s face onto black paper and cutting it out. These inexpensive cutouts were named "silhouettes" after Étienne de Silhouette, a French finance minister whose brief tenure in 1759 was marked by severe economic austerity measures. Because Silhouette advocated for extreme penny-pinching and cut his own pension to save state funds, his name became synonymous with anything cheap, minimal, or cut short. Consequently, the term "silhouette" was applied derisively to these simple paper cutouts to suggest they were the portraits of a cheapskate, though the art form eventually outlived its negative connotations.

The writer is considering adding the following sentence to the end of the paragraph:

"Silhouette later retired to his estate in Bry-sur-Marne, where he lived quietly until his death in 1767."

Should the writer make this addition?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: No, because it shifts the focus of the paragraph from the origins of the word "silhouette" to unrelated biographical details about the man himself.

Answer

No, because it shifts the focus of the paragraph from the origins of the word "silhouette" to unrelated biographical details about the man himself.
The paragraph is focused on explaining the transition from expensive portraits to profile cutouts and why these cutouts were named "silhouettes" (the etymology and historical context of the word). The proposed sentence introduces biographical facts about Silhouette's retirement and death, which shifts the focus away from this main idea. Therefore, the sentence should not be added.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the main focus of the paragraph.
The paragraph explains the origin of profile paper cutouts and how they came to be called "silhouettes" after Étienne de Silhouette due to his association with cheapness and austerity.
Identifying the main focus is essential for determining whether new information is relevant or distracting.
2
Evaluate the relevance of the proposed sentence.
The proposed sentence ("Silhouette later retired to his estate in Bry-sur-Marne, where he lived quietly until his death in 1767.") provides biographical facts about Silhouette's later life and death.
We must compare the content of the proposed sentence with the established topic of the paragraph.
3
Determine whether to add the sentence and select the correct justification.
The sentence should not be added because it introduces irrelevant biographical facts, shifting the focus away from the word's origin. Therefore, the correct choice is the option that rejects the addition for this reason.
This completes the evaluation of relevance and matches the decision and reasoning to the correct option.

Key Concept

Evaluating Relevance for Adding or Deleting Content
Estimated Time:1m 15s
Question 333Question

Passage Excerpt:
In 1856, while attempting to synthesize quinine to treat malaria, eighteen-year-old chemist William Henry Perkin accidentally created mauveine, the world’s first synthetic organic dye. At the time, purple clothing was a status symbol affordable only by the extremely wealthy because natural purple dyes were harvested from rare sea snails. [1]

The writer wants to add a sentence at point [1] that contrasts the traditional difficulty of obtaining purple dye with the ease and affordability introduced by Perkin's synthetic alternative. Which choice best accomplishes this goal?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Unlike the laborious extraction process from snails, Perkin's synthetic method produced a vibrant, inexpensive color that could be easily mass-manufactured.

Answer

Unlike the laborious extraction process from snails, Perkin's synthetic method produced a vibrant, inexpensive color that could be easily mass-manufactured.
The correct option successfully fulfills the rhetorical goal by contrasting the traditional difficulty of obtaining purple dye (the laborious extraction process from snails) with the ease and affordability of Perkin's synthetic alternative (an inexpensive color that could be easily mass-manufactured).

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the prompt's rhetorical goal.
The target sentence must contrast the traditional difficulty of obtaining purple dye (sea snails) with the ease and affordability of Perkin's synthetic alternative.
This establishes the exact criteria the correct option must meet.
2
Evaluate the choices for grammatical correctness.
The option containing a comma splice is eliminated due to its grammatical error.
ACT English questions require the correct choice to be both grammatically correct and rhetorically appropriate.
3
Evaluate the remaining choices against the rhetorical goal.
Only the option beginning with 'Unlike the laborious extraction...' provides both sides of the contrast requested.
Other grammatically correct options discuss unrelated historical context or subsequent business operations without contrasting the old and new methods.

Key Concept

Meeting Specific Rhetorical Goals
Question 334Question

A writer is editing an essay about inventor Walter Hunt and has drafted the following paragraph:

In 1849, inventor Walter Hunt was twisting a piece of brass wire at his desk, trying to figure out a way to pay off a fifteen-dollar debt. Within three hours, he had designed the first modern safety pin, featuring a clasp that covered the sharp point and a circular loop at the bend to act as a spring. Hunt quickly patented his invention and sold the rights for four hundred dollars, which easily cleared his debt but left him with none of the subsequent millions the product would generate. Over his lifetime, Hunt also designed a sewing machine and a street-sweeping vehicle, though he rarely capitalized on his creations.

The writer is considering adding the following sentence to the paragraph:

'Brass wire was relatively cheap and easy to acquire in nineteenth-century New York.'

Should the writer make this addition?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: No, because it interrupts the narrative flow by introducing a detail about the material's cost that is tangential to Hunt's invention and financial situation.

Answer

No, because it interrupts the narrative flow by introducing a detail about the material's cost that is tangential to Hunt's invention and financial situation.
The correct option correctly identifies that the sentence should not be added. The paragraph's focus is on Walter Hunt's invention of the safety pin and his financial history. The proposed addition about the cost and availability of brass wire introduces a tangential detail that interrupts the flow of the narrative.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the paragraph's main idea and focus.
The paragraph focuses on Walter Hunt inventing the safety pin in 1849 to pay a debt, and his general history of not profiting from his inventions.
To evaluate whether a proposed sentence is relevant, we must first establish the central theme and purpose of the existing text.
2
Analyze the proposed sentence for relevance to the main idea.
The proposed sentence discusses the cost and availability of brass wire in nineteenth-century New York.
We need to determine if this new information directly supports or expands upon the established focus of the paragraph.
3
Evaluate the rhetorical impact of adding the proposed sentence.
The sentence introduces a tangential detail about the market availability of brass wire, which shifts focus away from Hunt's personal narrative and financial situation, interrupting the flow of the passage. Therefore, the sentence should not be added.
Comparing the sentence's content to the paragraph's focus helps us make the correct decision and identify the correct rhetorical justification.

Key Concept

Evaluating Relevance for Adding or Deleting Content
Estimated Time:1m 0s
Question 335Question

In 1968, 3M chemist Spencer Silver set out to develop a super-strong adhesive for the aerospace industry. [X] Silver spent years promoting his discovery to colleagues, but it was not until a coworker used it to anchor bookmarks in a hymnal that the Post-it Note was born.

The writer wants to replace the bracketed marker [X] with a sentence that emphasizes both the unexpected outcome of Silver's research and the specific characteristics of his new substance. Which choice best fulfills this goal?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Instead of a powerful glue, he created a weak adhesive that stuck lightly to surfaces and could be easily removed without leaving residue.

Answer

The correct option is the sentence stating that instead of a powerful glue, he created a weak adhesive that stuck lightly to surfaces and could be easily removed without leaving residue.
The correct choice successfully establishes the unexpected result of the research (creating a weak adhesive instead of a strong glue) and outlines its physical properties (sticking lightly and being removable without leaving residue).

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the prompt to determine the exact rhetorical goal.
The goal is to find a sentence that emphasizes the unexpected outcome of the research and lists the specific characteristics of the new substance.
Identifying the target parameters prevents selecting choices that only satisfy one part of the prompt.
2
Check the options for grammatical correctness.
The option containing the phrase 'weak adhesive, it stuck' is grammatically incorrect due to a comma splice.
Any option containing a grammatical error can be automatically disqualified.
3
Evaluate the remaining choices against the rhetorical criteria.
The choice detailing the adhesive's low-tack and residue-free properties satisfies both the unexpected outcome and physical characteristics requirements, while the others focus on corporate support or personal feelings.
This confirms the only option that fulfills all conditions of the rhetorical prompt.

Key Concept

Meeting Specific Rhetorical Goals
Estimated Time:1m 0s
Question 336Question

Passage Excerpt:
In 1945, engineer Percy Spencer was working on active radar sets when he noticed that a chocolate bar in his pocket had suddenly melted. Intrigued by this phenomenon, Spencer decided to investigate the heating effect of magnetrons. He placed various foods near the radar equipment, including popping corn, which quickly began to pop and scatter across the lab. [X] Realizing that microwave energy could cook food rapidly, Spencer and his employer, Raytheon, filed a patent for the first commercial microwave oven.

The writer wants to add a sentence at point [X] to emphasize that the food Spencer tested became increasingly complex as his experiments progressed. Given that all the choices are true, which choice best accomplishes this goal?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Next, he graduated from simple kernels to a raw egg in its shell, observing how the waves cooked the yolk and whites from the inside out until the shell exploded.

Answer

The option that describes graduating from simple kernels to a raw egg in its shell is correct because it directly addresses the rhetorical goal of showing a progression in complexity by moving from simple popcorn kernels to a raw egg, while maintaining proper grammar and past-tense consistency with the rest of the passage.
The option that describes graduating from simple kernels to a raw egg in its shell is correct because it directly addresses the rhetorical goal of showing a progression in complexity by moving from simple popcorn kernels to a raw egg, while maintaining proper grammar and past-tense consistency with the rest of the passage.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the rhetorical goal specified in the prompt, which is to emphasize that the food Spencer tested became increasingly complex as his experiments progressed.
Identify that the correct sentence must explicitly show a transition from a simple food item to a more complex food item.
This establishes the criteria needed to evaluate each of the answer choices.
2
Evaluate the choices to see which ones are grammatically correct and consistent with the passage's tense.
Eliminate the choice containing a comma splice ('He then tested a raw egg...').
ACT English requires all sentences to be grammatically correct, even if they appear to meet the rhetorical goal.
3
Evaluate the remaining grammatically correct choices against the specific rhetorical goal.
Select the choice starting with 'Next, he graduated...' because it compares popcorn kernels to a raw egg with distinct parts (yolk and whites), showing a clear progression in complexity.
This choice is the only one that successfully meets the rhetorical requirement of indicating increasingly complex food items.

Key Concept

Meeting Specific Rhetorical Goals
Question 337Question

A writer is editing an essay about the history of the crossword puzzle and has drafted the following paragraph:

Arthur Wynne, an editor at the New York World, was tasked in 1913 with creating a new game for the newspaper’s Sunday fun section. Remembering a game called "magic squares" from his childhood in England, Wynne designed a diamond-shaped grid with blank spaces and clues to help readers fill in the letters. He called his creation a "Word-Cross." The game was an instant success, prompting readers to write in for more puzzles, which eventually led to the standardized crossword puzzles we solve today.

The writer is considering adding the following sentence to the paragraph (placed after the sentence "He called his creation a 'Word-Cross.'"):

"Wynne's father, a local metalworker, had also taught him how to play chess and checkers during their family travels."

Should the writer make this addition?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: No, because it interrupts the narrative focus on the creation of the crossword puzzle with unrelated details about Wynne's father and other games.

Answer

No, because it interrupts the narrative focus on the creation of the crossword puzzle with unrelated details about Wynne's father and other games.
The correct option is the one stating that the sentence should not be added because it interrupts the narrative focus with unrelated details. The paragraph focuses on how Arthur Wynne created the crossword puzzle in 1913 and how it became popular. Mentioning his father's profession and other games like chess and checkers is tangential and distracts the reader from the main narrative.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the main focus of the existing paragraph.
The paragraph focuses on the origin of the crossword puzzle, detailing how Arthur Wynne designed it in 1913 and its subsequent success.
To evaluate relevance, you must first establish the central topic of the passage.
2
Evaluate the content of the proposed sentence.
The proposed sentence introduces information about Wynne's father's profession (metalworker) and other games he learned (chess and checkers).
This step determines whether the new information aligns with or departs from the established focus.
3
Compare the proposed sentence with the paragraph's focus to make a decision and identify the correct justification.
The sentence should not be added because it introduces off-topic details about Wynne's family and unrelated games, which interrupts the paragraph's focus on the crossword puzzle. The correct choice must reflect this decision and logical reasoning.
This allows you to match the correct reasoning with the choices without relying on superficial keyword matches.

Key Concept

Evaluating Relevance for Adding or Deleting Content
Question 338Question

Passage Excerpt:
During the construction of the Golden Gate Bridge in the 1930s, the US War Department lobbied for the bridge to be painted with yellow and black stripes to ensure visibility for passing military ships. However, consulting architect Irving Morrow disagreed. He argued that the steel primer coat—a vibrant, reddish-orange—blended with the surrounding landscape while remaining highly visible in the bay's frequent fog.

The writer wants to choose a phrase for the underlined portion that emphasizes how the color of the bridge harmonizes specifically with the natural, changing hues of the local terrain and water. Which choice best accomplishes this goal?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: complemented the warm gold of the coastal hills and the cool blues of the water

Answer

complemented the warm gold of the coastal hills and the cool blues of the water
The correct choice successfully details the natural elements of the local environment (the gold hills and blue water) while maintaining the historical past-tense narrative with the verb 'complemented'.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the requested rhetorical goal.
The prompt asks for a phrase that emphasizes how the bridge's color harmonizes with the natural, changing hues of the local terrain and water.
This establishes the criteria that the correct answer must fulfill.
2
Evaluate the choices for alignment with the rhetorical goal.
The phrase mentioning the gold of the coastal hills and the cool blues of the water describes the natural landscape's hues, unlike the options mentioning military ships or Spanish architecture.
Only this description directly satisfies the natural environment aspect of the prompt.
3
Check the verb tense for grammatical consistency with the passage.
The passage is set in the past tense, establishing that the correct verb must be 'complemented' rather than the present-tense 'complements'.
This ensures the selected option is both rhetorically and grammatically correct.

Key Concept

Meeting Specific Rhetorical Goals
Question 339Question

A writer is editing a passage about the Wright brothers' early aviation experiments and has drafted the following paragraph:

In the autumn of 1901, Wilbur and Orville Wright realized that existing aerodynamic data was highly inaccurate, threatening to stall their aviation experiments. To resolve this, they constructed a wind tunnel in their bicycle shop. [1] The tunnel was a simple wooden box, six feet long and sixteen inches square, equipped with a fan driven by a two-horsepower gasoline engine. Inside, they tested sheet-metal lift balances, which they fabricated out of bicycle spokes and scrap metal. Through these rigorous trials, they collected the precise data necessary to design their successful 1902 glider.

The writer is considering adding the following sentence at Point [1]:

'The brothers also sold and repaired bicycles to fund their aviation research.'

Should the writer make this addition at Point [1]?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: No, because it interrupts the paragraph's description of the wind tunnel's construction and testing with unrelated information about their business.

Answer

The writer should not add the sentence because it interrupts the paragraph's focus on the construction and mechanical operation of the wind tunnel with unrelated details about their retail bicycle business.
The paragraph's primary focus is on the construction, dimensions, and operational function of the Wright brothers' wind tunnel as a tool to solve their aerodynamic data problem. The proposed sentence shifts the focus to how the brothers financed their research through their retail business, which is a tangential detail that interrupts the paragraph's technical description. Therefore, the sentence should not be added.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the main focus of the paragraph.
The paragraph describes the Wright brothers' decision to build a wind tunnel, its physical dimensions, its mechanical components, and how they used it to collect aerodynamic data for their glider.
Understanding the paragraph's focus is necessary to evaluate the relevance of any proposed additions.
2
Evaluate the relevance of the proposed sentence.
The proposed sentence ('The brothers also sold and repaired bicycles to fund their aviation research') introduces details about their retail business operations and financing.
Evaluating the sentence allows us to determine if it aligns with the paragraph's established topic.
3
Determine if the sentence should be added.
Since the paragraph is focused on engineering and testing details, adding a sentence about retail sales and funding would interrupt the logical flow with irrelevant information. Therefore, the sentence should not be added.
The correct decision is based on whether the sentence supports or disrupts the cohesion of the paragraph.

Key Concept

Evaluating Relevance for Adding or Deleting Content
Estimated Time:1m 0s
Question 340Question

Passage Excerpt:
In 1947, while working on the Harvard Mark II computer, computer scientist Grace Hopper and her team encountered a sudden system error. Upon examining the machine's hardware, they discovered a moth trapped in one of the electromagnetic relays. They carefully removed the insect and taped it into their logbook, [underlined portion], to document the unusual breakdown.

The writer wants to edit the underlined portion to emphasize the historic significance of this event as the origin of the computer programming term "debugging." Which choice best accomplishes this goal?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: coining the phrase 'first actual case of bug being found' and inspiring the modern programming term 'debugging'

Answer

coining the phrase 'first actual case of bug being found' and inspiring the modern programming term 'debugging'
The choice that mentions coining the phrase 'first actual case of bug being found' and inspiring the modern programming term 'debugging' is correct because it directly addresses the writer's goal to highlight the origin of the term 'debugging' in computer programming.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the prompt to identify the specific rhetorical goal.
The goal is to choose an option that emphasizes the historic significance of the event as the origin of the term 'debugging'.
ACT English questions of this type require satisfying a highly specific prompt constraint.
2
Evaluate the choices for grammatical correctness and relevance to the goal.
Identify that the choice referencing the coining of 'first actual case of bug being found' and 'debugging' is grammatically correct and directly addresses the goal. The other choices either focus on irrelevant details or contain grammatical errors like comma splices.
This process eliminates distractors that are either grammatically incorrect or rhetorically off-topic.
3
Select the correct option based on this evaluation.
The choice mentioning the coining of the phrase and inspiring 'debugging' is selected.
It is the only choice that successfully fulfills the rhetorical goal stated in the prompt.

Key Concept

Meeting Specific Rhetorical Goals
PreviousPage 17 / 18Next
Topic Development Practice Questions — ACT — Page 17 | Examkin