Read the following excerpt from a colonial Virginia statute enacted in 1669:
"[I]f any slave resist his master... and by the extremity of the correction should chance to die, that his death shall not be accompted felony, but the master... be acquit of all punishment... since it cannot be presumed that prepensed malice (which alone makes murther felony) should induce any man to destroy his own estate."
Which of the following historical developments is best illustrated by this statute?
- The legal definition of enslaved individuals as chattel property, which protected masters from criminal prosecution for acts of violence.Answer
- BThe immediate codification of a complete, uniform system of racial slavery across the colonies upon initial British settlement.
- CThe reliance on English common law to determine that an individual's legal status was inherited from the father's lineage.
- DThe complete suppression of covert daily resistance among enslaved populations through state-mandated violence.
Answer
The legal definition of enslaved individuals as chattel property, which protected masters from criminal prosecution for acts of violence.
The statute's logic that a master would not destroy his own estate explicitly defines the enslaved person as chattel property, providing legal immunity to the master for acts of fatal violence.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
The statutory construction of chattel slavery and the legal protection of slaveholders' authority.
Estimated Time:1m 30s