In 1781, an enslaved woman named Elizabeth Freeman (known as Mum Bett) fled her enslaver’s household in Massachusetts after shielding her sister from a physical assault by their mistress. Freeman subsequently retained attorney Theodore Sedgwick and successfully sued for her freedom, arguing that the newly adopted Massachusetts Constitution—which declared all individuals "born free and equal"—made her enslavement unlawful.
Which of the following conclusions about the gendered dimensions of slavery and resistance is best supported by this historical event?
- Enslaved women’s resistance was shaped by their specific placement in the domestic sphere, often leading to actions aimed at protecting family members and leveraging local legal systems.Answer
- BColonial laws governing maternal descent (*partus sequitur ventrem*) granted enslaved women the legal standing to sue for their children's freedom.
- CEnslaved women primarily responded to household violence by escaping to establish independent maroon communities in northern cities.
- DFreeman’s court case served as the organizational blueprint for the Stono Rebellion, which demanded an end to gendered labor on plantations.
Answer
Enslaved women’s resistance was shaped by their specific placement in the domestic sphere, often leading to actions aimed at protecting family members and leveraging local legal systems.
The correct answer is the option stating that enslaved women's resistance was shaped by their domestic placement and involved defending family and leveraging legal systems. Elizabeth Freeman’s experience illustrates how domestic labor brought enslaved women into close contact with household violence, prompting resistance actions centered on protecting female kin and utilizing revolutionary-era legal changes (such as the Massachusetts Constitution) to secure freedom through the courts.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
Gendered Dimensions of Slavery and Resistance
Estimated Time:1m 30s