Read the following passage from W. E. B. Du Bois's *The Souls of Black Folk* (1903):
"So far as Mr. Washington preaches Effort, Patience, and Industrial Training for the masses, we must hold up his hands and strive with him... But so far as Mr. Washington apologizes for injustice, North or South, does not value the privilege and duty of voting, belittles the emasculating effects of caste-distinctions, and opposes the higher training and ambition of our brighter minds... we must unceasingly and firmly oppose them."
Which of the following statements best describes the relationship between the strategies of Booker T. Washington and W. E. B. Du Bois as expressed in this passage?
- Du Bois agreed with the utility of industrial education for the general population but argued that it was insufficient without political rights and higher education for leadership.Answer
- BDu Bois completely rejected Washington's focus on industrial training and agricultural education, advocating instead that all African Americans receive a classical liberal arts education.
- CWashington argued that political representation and civil rights were secondary to economic independence, which Du Bois believed should be permanently delayed.
- DWashington and Du Bois held entirely incompatible visions for Black progress, with no agreement on the necessity of education or economic advancement.
Answer
Du Bois agreed with the utility of industrial education for the general population but argued that it was insufficient without political rights and higher education for leadership.
The correct answer accurately captures the nuanced perspective presented in the passage: Du Bois acknowledges the value of industrial education for the masses ('we must hold up his hands and strive with him') but argues that Washington's accommodationist approach to civil rights and higher education is fundamentally flawed and must be opposed.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
The Booker T. Washington and W.E.B. Du Bois Debate