Examkin

Question of the Day

A fresh AP African American Studies question every day — build the habit.

Read the excerpt below from the majority opinion of the Mississippi Supreme Court in *Ratcliffe v. Beale* (1896):

"Within the field of permissible action under the Federal Constitution, the Convention swept the circle of expedients to obstruct the exercise of the franchise by the negro race. By reason of its previous condition of servitude and dependency, this race had acquired or accentuated certain characteristics, which distinguished them as a people, and reference to which would list them for obstruction, and yet could be declared in other than racial terms..."

Which of the following historical developments is best explained by the judicial reasoning in this excerpt?

  1. The implementation of facially neutral state constitutional provisions that exploited the legacy of enslavement to disenfranchise Black voters while avoiding federal intervention.Answer
  2. B
    The consolidation of de facto disenfranchisement practices in Northern states to match the legal segregation of public accommodations in the South.
  3. C
    The reliance on economic labor structures like sharecropping as the formal legal method used by Southern states to strip African Americans of their constitutional citizenship.
  4. D
    The adoption of federal constitutional amendments that permanently closed the legal loopholes permitting Southern states to implement convict leasing.

Answer

The implementation of facially neutral state constitutional provisions that exploited the legacy of enslavement to disenfranchise Black voters while avoiding federal intervention.
The correct answer is correct because the Mississippi Supreme Court explicitly acknowledges the state's strategy of utilizing 'facially neutral' constitutional requirements. By drafting requirements (like literacy tests and poll taxes) that did not mention race but targeted socio-economic disadvantages directly inherited from slavery, Southern states successfully disenfranchised Black voters while avoiding federal intervention under the Fifteenth Amendment.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the historical context and source of the excerpt.
The excerpt is from the Mississippi Supreme Court case *Ratcliffe v. Beale* (1896), commenting on the Mississippi Constitution of 1890.
Understanding the source helps identify that the legal strategies discussed are state-level constitutional efforts to restrict Black political power following Reconstruction.
2
Examine the specific legal mechanism described in the text.
The text states the convention used 'expedients... declared in other than racial terms' that targeted 'characteristics' resulting from 'previous condition of servitude.'
This shows that the state deliberately drafted 'facially neutral' voting restrictions (such as literacy tests, poll taxes, and understanding clauses) that disproportionately affected newly freed Black citizens due to the lack of educational and economic resources during slavery.
3
Connect the state-level strategy to federal constitutional constraints.
By avoiding explicit racial classifications, the state bypassed the Fifteenth Amendment's prohibition on racial discrimination in voting, preventing federal court intervention.
This explains why the measures were framed in non-racial terms while achieving the intended racial disenfranchisement.

Key Concept

Disenfranchisement through facially neutral constitutional design
See full question & explanationTake a full practice test