Read the following passage from a fictional novel:
> I have always prided myself on the absolute neutrality of my judgments, particularly regarding my ward, Mariana. If I have restricted her correspondence with young Mr. Sterling, it was solely out of a dispassionate regard for her intellectual development, which would surely suffer under the influence of his rather pedestrian letters. It is quite absurd for the housekeeper to suggest that I harbor any jealousy of the young man’s attention toward her. Why, Sterling is a clerk of the most ordinary parts, whereas my own position as her guardian and intellectual mentor places me far above such petty rivalries. When Mariana wept at her desk yesterday, I did not console her, for I know that a disciplined mind is only forged in the fire of solitary reflection. She will, in time, thank me for my firmness, just as she will realize that my decision to intercept their meeting at the garden gate was not an act of intrusion, but the protective vigilance of a disinterested guardian.
The narrator’s insistence on his own "absolute neutrality" is chiefly undermined by which of the following?
- Ahis sincere commitment to shielding Mariana from the pedestrian influences of the outside world
- Bthe author’s underlying critique of the rigid class dynamics between guardians and clerks
- his controlling behavior and emotional insensitivity, which reveal a personal stake in Mariana's isolationAnswer
- Dthe chronological account of Mariana weeping at her desk and being forced to reflect in solitary confinement
- Ehis rational evaluation of Mr. Sterling as a clerk of ordinary parts who is unfit to correspond with Mariana