Read the following passage:
For fifteen years, Michael had approached the plaster with the clinical detachment of a surgeon, his scalpels and solvents dedicated to a singular, silent creed: the eradication of history's insult. To him, the true fresco lay buried beneath the grime of centuries, and his duty was to resurrect the artist's original, unblemished intention. Yet, as he worked on the damp wall of the Saint Jude chapel, scraping away the soot of countless votive candles, his blade snagged on a series of jagged, shallow grooves. Illuminated by his halogen lamp, they resolved into a crude, deeply carved name—*Beatrice*—and a date from the plague year of 1665, slicing directly through the painted robe of the Madonna. Michael raised his solvent-soaked swab to dissolve the ancient accretion around the cuts, but stopped. He stared at the scar on the plaster, then slowly lowered his hand, leaving the defacement untouched. The pristine image, he saw now, was merely a monument to a solitary mind; the scar was a testament to a collective grief.
Which of the following best describes the shift in Michael’s values indicated by his decision to leave the carved name untouched?
- AAn expression of the author's condemnation of modern restoration technologies as being inherently destructive to classical art
- A shift from prioritizing the sterile restoration of an artist's original intent to valuing the emotional, shared history accumulated by the object over timeAnswer
- CA chronological transition from analyzing the chemical composition of the plaster to investigating the historical records of the 1665 plague
- DA rejection of the original artist's religious authority in favor of celebrating the secular rebellion of the parishioner