Read the following passage carefully before choosing your answer:
It is a matter of documented historical record—or it would be, had the town council not been compromised by the descendants of the grocer Silas Vance—that my great-grandfather single-handedly saved the valley from the flood of 1888. The official archives, written by men of notoriously weak constitution and even weaker prose, claim that a communal effort of forty citizens secured the southern levee. This is patently absurd. Forty men could not possibly align their efforts without a singular, guiding intellect, and my great-grandfather’s journals clearly note that he spent the entire night of the storm shouting directions from his dry porch. That the town chose to honor the laborers who merely piled the sandbags, rather than the visionary who pointed where they should go, is a testament to the persistent jealousy that has dogged my family for generations. Even now, as I walk down the avenue that should bear our name but instead honors a common blacksmith, I am struck by the town’s collective amnesia. They call it 'civic history,' but it is nothing more than a conspiracy of the mediocre to erase the exceptional.
The narrator's account of the town's history primarily reveals which of the following about his perspective?
- AHe is the only objective chronicler in a town that has systematically erased its true history.
- BThe author is exposing the corrupt political motives of the town council.
- His deep-seated family pride distorts his interpretation of communal historical events.Answer
- DThe town archives are factually incorrect because they were written by uneducated laborers.
- EThe townspeople have waged a malicious campaign of jealousy to ruin the narrator's family name.