Read the passage carefully, then answer the question that follows.
The leather of the spine was dry, flaking off in red-brown scales under Silas’s thumb like the skin of a dormant cicada. He worked in the alcove behind the tall stacks of octavos, where the smell of hide glue and damp rag paper settled into a thick, comforting silt. Outside, the carriage wheels on the cobblestones of the high street clattered with a remote, busy urgency that did not belong to him. Silas pulled the linen thread taut, feeling the resistance of the heavy signatures. He knew the history of this town not by its public acts or the speeches in the square, but by the grease of thumbprints on the margins of its parish records, by the spilled tallow on the pages of its ledgers. To the townspeople, Silas was a shadow behind the shopfront, a quiet mechanic of paper. Yet as he smoothed the gold leaf onto the calfskin, his mind tracked the silent decay of their memory, a slow rot he alone was tasked with arresting. The book was a fortress against time, and he, its sole defender.
Which of the following best describes the primary function of the third-person limited narrative point of view in the passage?
- AIt conveys the author's personal critique of the rapid modernization and industrialization of the town.
- BIt highlights the chronological steps of book restoration to emphasize Silas’s technical skills.
- It contrasts the town's superficial perception of Silas with his own sense of profound, hidden purpose.Answer
- DIt exposes Silas as an unreliable narrator whose claims of saving the town's history are contradicted by his isolation.
- EIt establishes an omniscient viewpoint that reveals the townspeople's secret appreciation for Silas's craftsmanship.