Read the following passage carefully:
"It was, of course, entirely Arthur’s doing that the greenhouse project crumbled before the first frost. I had warned him, in that quiet, measured tone I reserve for those who lack my foresight, that the glass he selected was far too thin to withstand the northern gales. He merely smiled—that patronizing, irritating curve of the lips he always wears when he is about to make a fool of himself—and told me to worry about the soil chemistry instead. Naturally, I did. I spent weeks in the cellar, refining the nitrogen ratios to a degree of precision that would have made a university professor weep with envy. If the soil was too rich, as Arthur later claimed in his typical, dramatic fashion, it was only because the plants were deprived of the proper light due to his structural incompetence. How could the roots thrive in what was essentially a tomb of shadows? The townspeople, who have never understood the delicate balance of scientific agriculture, chose to blame my compost, whispering that I had burned the seedlings out of sheer negligence. But one cannot expect peasants to distinguish between a chemical triumph and a meteorological disaster. I remain confident that had my formulas been paired with a partner of even moderate competence, our tables would now be overflowing with winter tomatoes, rather than this damp, moldering wreckage."
Which of the following best describes how the narrator’s biased perspective shapes the reader’s understanding of the greenhouse project's failure?
- AThe narrator’s detailed account confirms that Arthur’s poor architectural choices were the sole cause of the plants’ demise.
- BThe narrator’s voice reflects the author’s disdain for the local townspeople’s resistance to modern agricultural advancements.
- CThe narrator’s description provides a chronological summary of how the weather and the townspeople ruined the crop.
- The narrator’s insistence on their own scientific precision serves to highlight their self-deception regarding the destructive potency of the compost.Answer
- EThe narrator’s frustration underscores a tragic struggle between an idealistic visionary and a hostile community.