A student is writing an argumentative essay for the AP Spanish Language exam. The prompt asks: "Should university education be completely free for all students?"
The student's thesis is: "While the rising cost of tuition places a heavy burden on students, making university completely free for everyone is not the ideal solution; instead, a progressive tuition system based on family income would better balance accessibility and educational quality."
The student is listening to the auditory source, which is an interview with an educational economist. The economist states: "If we eliminate tuition entirely for everyone, universities will lose a vital income source, which could lead to overcrowded classrooms and a decline in academic quality. Financial aid should be directed exclusively to those who truly need it."
Which of the following sentences best integrates the evidence from this auditory source to effectively support the student's thesis?
- Although some argue for universally free education, the economist in the interview warns that this policy could lead to overcrowded classrooms, reinforcing the argument that a progressive payment system is necessary to maintain academic standards.Answer
- BThe auditory source is an interview with an economist who explains that eliminating tuition completely causes universities to lose money, which lowers academic quality and overcrowds classrooms.
- CAs demonstrated by the article's discussion of student loans and the graph showing rising costs, the financial burden is too high, proving that a progressive system is the only way to save higher education.
- DMaking university free will cause institutions to lose a vital source of income and lead to a decline in academic quality, which means that we need a progressive system instead.