Read the following letter:
Dear Mr. Vance,
I would like to express my gratitude for your team’s dedication to organizing the upcoming exhibition of my collection, *Ethereal Landscapes*. The promotional materials look exceptional, and I share your excitement for the opening next month.
Upon reviewing the gallery floor plan you sent yesterday, I noticed that *Whispers of the Valley*—the centerpiece of this series—has been scheduled for display in the transition corridor leading to the sculpture garden. While I appreciate the natural light in that passageway, this particular oil painting requires a spacious wall to allow viewers to experience its scale and complex texturing from a distance, which the narrow corridor cannot accommodate. I am concerned that placing it there might diminish its impact and disrupt the thematic flow of the collection.
Could we explore alternative options for this piece? Perhaps it could be positioned in the main exhibition hall, even if it means adjusting the placement of some smaller watercolor studies. I believe this change would optimize the visitor experience and do justice to the core narrative of the exhibition.
Sincerely,
Clara Sterling
Based on the letter, which of the following best describes the writer's attitude and primary purpose?
- AHer attitude is critical and demanding, and her purpose is to insist on displaying her watercolor studies in the main hall.
- BHer attitude is dissatisfied and accusatory, and her purpose is to complain about the lack of natural light in the gallery space.
- Her attitude is professional and assertive, and her purpose is to propose adjusting the display layout for her main painting.Answer
- DHer attitude is apologetic and submissive, and her purpose is to ask for forgiveness for requesting changes so close to the exhibition date.