Read the following passage about the Canary Islands:
"In the rugged, volcanic terrain of La Gomera in the Canary Islands, a unique acoustic tradition has survived the centuries. *Silbo Gomero*, a whistled language developed by early inhabitants to communicate across deep ravines, mimics the Spanish language's phonology through varying pitches and durations. With the advent of roads and mobile telephony in the mid-twentieth century, this vital mode of communication faced imminent extinction. However, a major legislative shift in 1999 made *Silbo Gomero* a mandatory subject in the island's primary schools.
While this institutional intervention has successfully generated a new generation of whistlers, it has also sparked a debate about the nature of heritage preservation. Critics argue that transplanting a living, functional practice from its organic rural context into a structured classroom risks reducing it to a performative relic—a cultural spectacle packaged primarily for the tourist industry. Proponents, conversely, maintain that institutionalization is the only viable shield against the homogenizing force of globalized technology. In evaluating this educational experiment, one must ask whether we are preserving a living community resource or merely curating an ethnographic curiosity."
Which of the following best characterizes the author’s perspective on the institutional preservation of *Silbo Gomero*?
- Analytical and cautious, emphasizing the conflict between saving the language and stripping it of its organic utility.Answer
- BUnconditionally positive, praising the educational policy as a model for preserving endangered cultures.
- CHostile and dismissive, viewing the classroom integration as a futile effort against technological progress.
- DDetached and objective, focusing solely on the historical timeline of the language without offering an opinion.