Question

Difficulty: HardAnalyzing Author Purpose, Perspective, and Tone

Read the following passage about the Canary Islands:

"In the rugged, volcanic terrain of La Gomera in the Canary Islands, a unique acoustic tradition has survived the centuries. *Silbo Gomero*, a whistled language developed by early inhabitants to communicate across deep ravines, mimics the Spanish language's phonology through varying pitches and durations. With the advent of roads and mobile telephony in the mid-twentieth century, this vital mode of communication faced imminent extinction. However, a major legislative shift in 1999 made *Silbo Gomero* a mandatory subject in the island's primary schools.

While this institutional intervention has successfully generated a new generation of whistlers, it has also sparked a debate about the nature of heritage preservation. Critics argue that transplanting a living, functional practice from its organic rural context into a structured classroom risks reducing it to a performative relic—a cultural spectacle packaged primarily for the tourist industry. Proponents, conversely, maintain that institutionalization is the only viable shield against the homogenizing force of globalized technology. In evaluating this educational experiment, one must ask whether we are preserving a living community resource or merely curating an ethnographic curiosity."

Which of the following best characterizes the author’s perspective on the institutional preservation of *Silbo Gomero*?

  1. Analytical and cautious, emphasizing the conflict between saving the language and stripping it of its organic utility.Answer
  2. B
    Unconditionally positive, praising the educational policy as a model for preserving endangered cultures.
  3. C
    Hostile and dismissive, viewing the classroom integration as a futile effort against technological progress.
  4. D
    Detached and objective, focusing solely on the historical timeline of the language without offering an opinion.

Answer

Analytical and cautious, emphasizing the conflict between saving the language and stripping it of its organic utility.
The correct answer is correct because the author's tone throughout the second paragraph is analytical and questioning. While acknowledging the program's success, the author ends the text with a rhetorical question highlighting the risk of reducing a living language to an 'ethnographic curiosity,' which indicates a cautious perspective rather than unconditional approval or complete dismissal.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the passage to identify the main topic and the author's presentation of arguments.
The passage discusses the preservation of Silbo Gomero via mandatory school enrollment, noting positive outcomes but raising debates between critics and proponents.
Understanding the structure of the argument is essential to capturing the author's tone.
2
Evaluate the author's closing remarks and word choices to gauge bias or perspective.
The author concludes with a rhetorical question: 'whether we are preserving a living community resource or merely curating an ethnographic curiosity.'
The final sentence encapsulates the author's own voice and reflective stance on the issue.
3
Synthesize the findings to match with the most accurate description of tone.
The combination of acknowledging success and raising structural concerns reflects an analytical, cautious attitude that values the language but questions the preservation method.
This matches the target response while eliminating oversimplified positive, negative, or completely neutral descriptions.

Key Concept

Analyzing Author Purpose, Perspective, and Tone
Rate this question