Question

Difficulty: MediumDistinguishing Fact from Opinion and Bias

Read the following English translation of an editorial from a Chilean newspaper regarding the use of fog catchers in the Coquimbo region:

"In the semi-arid hills of Coquimbo, annual rainfall rarely exceeds 100 millimeters. To combat this chronic water scarcity, local communities have installed large nylon mesh nets designed to harvest water from the dense coastal fog known as the camanchaca. According to recent reports from the regional agricultural extension, these fog catchers collect an average of five liters of water per square meter of mesh daily. This simple, low-cost technology represents the only sensible future for farming in northern Chile, where traditional irrigation methods have utterly failed. While large-scale agricultural corporations stubbornly lobby for expensive, energy-intensive desalination plants, fog harvesting offers a harmonious solution that respects the delicate balance of our desert ecosystem. Ultimately, the corporate push for desalination is driven by vanity and profit, rather than a genuine concern for the local communities who have inhabited these arid lands for generations."

Based on the editorial, which of the following statements is presented as an objective, verifiable fact?

  1. Fog catchers in the Coquimbo region collect an average of five liters of water per square meter of mesh daily.Answer
  2. B
    Fog harvesting is the only sensible future for agriculture in northern Chile.
  3. C
    The push for desalination plants by agricultural corporations is driven by vanity and profit.
  4. D
    Traditional irrigation methods in northern Chile have failed due to corporate stubbornness.

Answer

Fog catchers in the Coquimbo region collect an average of five liters of water per square meter of mesh daily.
The statement regarding fog catchers collecting an average of five liters of water per square meter of mesh daily is presented as a verifiable fact backed by recent reports from the regional agricultural extension. This makes it an objective piece of data rather than the author's personal opinion.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Scan the text for statements supported by external reference sources or quantitative data.
Identify the reference to regional agricultural extension reports stating that fog catchers collect an average of five liters of water per square meter of mesh daily.
Factual claims are typically backed by data, measurements, or official reports rather than emotional language.
2
Analyze the remaining statements to determine if they contain subjective language or value judgments.
Identify words like 'only sensible future,' 'stubbornly,' and 'driven by vanity and profit' as indicators of the author's personal opinion and editorial bias.
Subjective adjectives and value judgments characterize opinions and editorial bias rather than objective facts.
3
Compare the identified fact with the options to find the correct match.
Confirm that the statement about the five-liter average collection rate is the only objective, verifiable fact in the choices.
The correct choice must represent verified data reported by an external body rather than the author's own commentary.

Key Concept

Distinguishing objective data and verifiable facts from subjective authorial opinions and rhetorical bias in journalistic texts.
Estimated Time:1m 30s
Rate this question