Examkin

Question

Difficulty: MediumDistinguishing Fact from Opinion and Bias

Read the following English translation of a journalistic article concerning the preservation of viticulture in Mendoza, Argentina:

In the Mendoza province of Argentina, the integration of drip irrigation systems and soil moisture sensors has transformed traditional viticulture. According to the regional agricultural union, water usage in participating vineyards has decreased by 30%30\% since 20222022. While these figures demonstrate clear resource efficiency, local traditionalists argue that this technological shift destroys the ancestral connection between the winemaker and the land. They believe that automated sensors cannot replicate the intuitive understanding of soil health developed over generations. However, proponents argue that without these systems, climate change will render viticulture in Mendoza impossible within the next two decades. The regional government recently announced a 1.21.2 million dollar subsidy program to help small producers acquire these sensors, aiming to modernize the sector. Ultimately, it is clear that only those who embrace this digital revolution will survive, as relying on traditional farming methods in this day and age is nothing short of reckless.

Based on the article, which of the following statements represents a verifiable fact rather than an opinion or subjective assertion?

  1. A
    Continuing to use traditional agricultural methods under current conditions is a reckless decision.
  2. Water consumption in vineyards using the new technology has dropped by 30%30\% since 20222022.Answer
  3. C
    Viticulture in the Mendoza province will become completely impossible within twenty years without soil sensors.
  4. D
    Automated soil sensors are unable to match the intuitive understanding of soil health possessed by traditional farmers.

Answer

Water consumption in vineyards using the new technology has dropped by 30%30\% since 20222022.
The statement concerning the 30%30\% drop in water consumption is a verifiable fact because it describes a measurable, historical outcome backed by statistics from the regional agricultural union.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the passage to distinguish objective statements from subjective ones.
Identified factual claims backed by external data and subjective assertions reflecting personal beliefs or predictions.
This separation is necessary to filter out opinions and locate the verifiable fact.
2
Evaluate the statement about water consumption reduction.
Confirmed it is presented as a quantitative measurement (30%30\% reduction) from a specific organization (regional agricultural union).
Objective measurements from documented sources constitute verifiable facts.
3
Examine the remaining statements to ensure they are subjective.
Verified that claims about the future impossibility of farming, the limits of technology vs. intuition, and the 'recklessness' of traditional methods are predictions, beliefs, and value judgments.
This confirms that the other options represent opinions or bias, leaving only one correct factual statement.

Key Concept

Distinguishing objective, verifiable facts from subjective opinions, predictions, and authorial bias in journalistic writing.
Rate this question

Topics

Distinguishing Fact from Opinion and Bias

More questions from this topic