Consider this passage from an editorial on sustainable agriculture in the Andean region:
"In the high valleys of the Andes, ancient agricultural terraces have stood for centuries as a testament to early engineering. Modern industrial agriculture, with its reliance on chemical fertilizers and heavy machinery, has promised higher short-term yields. However, these modern practices often lead to severe soil erosion and water scarcity in mountain ecosystems. By contrast, the traditional terrace system naturally conserves water and prevents landslides, offering a time-tested model of sustainability. Therefore, restoring these ancient structures is not merely an act of historical preservation, but an ecological necessity for the region's future."
Which of the following best describes the rhetorical function of the contrast presented in the fourth sentence ("By contrast, the traditional terrace system...")?
- It highlights the ecological benefits of traditional methods to support the argument for their restoration.Answer
- BIt serves as a concession that acknowledges the superior economic efficiency of modern farming.
- CIt introduces a speculative theory about the future of mountain agriculture without presenting concrete evidence.
- DIt establishes a neutral, objective description of both farming methods to avoid taking a definitive stance.