A student is writing a synthesis paragraph and needs to connect two opposing viewpoints from different sources. Source 1 argues that urban development harms the environment, while Source 2 claims that green urban planning helps biodiversity.
Read the following sentence from the student's essay:
'La Fuente 1 afirma que el desarrollo urbano destruye los hábitats naturales; [BLANK], la Fuente 2 sostiene que la planificación urbana moderna puede aumentar la biodiversidad.'
Which of the following Spanish logical connectors best fills the blank to effectively synthesize these opposing viewpoints?
- Aademás
- sin embargoAnswer
- Cpor lo tanto
- Den conclusión
Answer
The correct answer is the contrasting connector 'sin embargo'.
The sentence requires a contrasting connector to synthesize two opposing viewpoints (destruction of habitats vs. increasing biodiversity). The phrase 'sin embargo' (however) effectively establishes this contrast and links the two sources logically.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
Using contrasting logical connectors to synthesize opposing viewpoints
Hints
1
Identify the main idea of each source. Do they agree with each other, or do they present opposite views?
2
Source 1 talks about destroying habitats, while Source 2 talks about increasing biodiversity. You need a transition word that highlights this contrast.
3
Look for the Spanish equivalent of 'however' or 'nevertheless'.
Practice More
Practice writing synthesis sentences using sources that agree with each other, applying additive connectors like 'de igual manera' or 'asimismo'.
Alternative Method
You can also use 'por el contrario' or 'en contraste' to achieve the same synthetic effect in this sentence.
Estimated Time:1m 0s