Question

Difficulty: EasyDrawing Conclusions and Implications

During an interview on coastal conservation, a marine biologist explains that local fish populations rebounded only after fishermen agreed to stop dropping heavy anchors onto the seafloor and instead began securing their boats to designated mooring buoys. Based on the interview, which conclusion can be drawn regarding the use of these mooring buoys?

  1. A
    They completely eliminated all forms of environmental pollution across the entire coastal region.
  2. B
    They were designed primarily to encourage large commercial fleets to expand fishing in shallow waters.
  3. They protected underwater habitats from physical damage, enabling young fish populations to recover.Answer
  4. D
    They represent a policy proposed by the interviewer that the biologist strongly opposed.

Answer

They protected underwater habitats from physical damage, enabling young fish populations to recover.
The conclusion that the buoys protected underwater habitats from physical damage, enabling young fish populations to recover, is directly supported by the biologist's explanation that halting anchor drops removed disturbance to the seabed.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the cause-and-effect relationship described by the interviewee.
The biologist noted that stopping anchor drops on the seafloor allowed juvenile fish habitats to stabilize without disruption.
Establishing the explicit connection between mooring buoys and reduced habitat damage is necessary for drawing a valid conclusion.
2
Evaluate the answer choices to find the statement that logically follows from the evidence without overstating it.
The statement emphasizing habitat protection and fish recovery accurately captures the implication of the interview.
Valid implications must be directly supported by the text and avoid unjustified over-generalizations.

Key Concept

Drawing logical conclusions and implications from interview statements
Estimated Time:45s
Rate this question