Review the following dialogue between a broadcast journalist (Interviewer) and the director of an indigenous weaving cooperative, Elena Ramos (Interviewee):
Interviewer: "Integrating digital provenance tags and blockchain certification into each handwoven garment appears to be the ultimate safeguard against counterfeit mass production, allowing your artisans to command premium prices in international luxury markets."
Elena Ramos: "While market transparency has practical utility, reducing our ancestral craft to a verifiable cryptographic code overlooks the core of our heritage. Authentic value does not reside in an encrypted digital token; it is sustained through the living relationships between master weavers and apprentices in our communal workshops. Overemphasizing digital validation risks prioritizing commercial commodification above intergenerational cultural transmission."
Which of the following statements best differentiates the perspectives of the two speakers regarding digital certification?
- AThe interviewer views digital certification as an unnecessary bureaucratic hurdle, whereas the cooperative director believes digital tracking will permanently resolve workshop labor shortages.
- The interviewer highlights the commercial and anti-counterfeiting value of digital verification, whereas the cooperative director cautions that technical validation subordinates communal heritage to market commodification.Answer
- CThe interviewer argues that communal apprenticeships are the sole measure of value, whereas the cooperative director advocates for digital encryption to expand overseas export profits.
- DThe interviewer expresses deep skepticism toward applying modern technology to traditional crafts, whereas the cooperative director embraces digital tokens as the primary educational tool for young weavers.