Examkin

Question

Difficulty: MediumIdeological and Legal Debates over Slavery

"It matters not what way the Supreme Court may hereafter decide as to the abstract question whether slavery may or may not go into a territory under the Constitution. The people have the lawful means to introduce it or exclude it as they please, for the reason that slavery cannot exist a day or an hour anywhere, unless it is supported by local police regulations. Those police regulations can only be established by the local legislature; and if the people are opposed to slavery, they will elect representatives to that body who will by unfriendly legislation effectually prevent the introduction of it into their midst."

— Stephen A. Douglas, speech at Freeport, Illinois, 1858

Which of the following was a direct historical consequence of the political position advocated in the excerpt?

  1. It alienated Southern Democrats from the author, leading to a sectional split in the Democratic Party during the election of 1860.Answer
  2. B
    It empowered the federal executive branch to unilaterally determine the legal status of slavery in newly acquired territories.
  3. C
    It unified Northern and Southern Democrats around a shared opposition to federal tariff policies, temporarily resolving the sectional crisis.
  4. D
    It resulted in a congressional compromise that replaced chattel slavery in the western territories with a system of temporary indentured servitude.

Answer

It alienated Southern Democrats from the author, leading to a sectional split in the Democratic Party during the election of 1860.
The correct answer is correct because Stephen A. Douglas's Freeport Doctrine argued that territories could circumvent the Dred Scott decision by refusing to pass local laws protecting slavery. This position deeply angered Southern Democrats who demanded positive federal protection of slavery, resulting in the fracturing of the Democratic Party in 1860.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the stimulus to identify the core argument.
The author argues that regardless of Supreme Court decisions, territorial legislatures can exclude slavery through 'unfriendly legislation' (refusing to pass local police codes protecting slave property).
This establishes the historical context of the Freeport Doctrine, Douglas's attempt to reconcile popular sovereignty with the Dred Scott v. Sandford decision.
2
Evaluate the political consequences of this argument among national parties.
While this position helped Douglas win re-election to the Senate in Illinois, it alienated Southern Democrats who wanted federal protection for slavery in all territories.
Understanding the reaction of different factions helps identify the long-term impact on national politics.
3
Connect the split in the Democratic faction to the election of 1860.
The division between Northern and Southern Democrats led to separate nominations in 1860, splitting the vote and enabling the Republican candidate, Abraham Lincoln, to win the presidency.
This confirms the direct historical consequence of Douglas's position.

Key Concept

The political and sectional consequences of the debates over slavery's expansion and popular sovereignty in the 1850s.
Rate this question

Topics

Ideological and Legal Debates over Slavery

More questions from this topic