"He that accepts protection, tacitly promises obedience. We may therefore the more willingly contemplate the place to which they [the colonists] are gone, and the rights which they have carried with them. They went out from a state where they had votes, to a state where they had no votes... but they are still subjects of the King, and must submit to the authority of Parliament... To suppose that he who goes voluntarily to America can complain of losing his voice in the legislature is to complain of a necessity which he himself created."
— Samuel Johnson, *Taxation No Tyranny*, 1775
The arguments expressed in the excerpt most directly served to justify which of the following shifts in British imperial policy after 1763?
- AThe creation of a stronger federal government with the power to collect direct taxes under the U.S. Constitution.
- The transition from a period of salutary neglect to the assertion of direct parliamentary authority and revenue-raising taxes.Answer
- CThe establishment of colonial free enterprise by removing trade regulations to help the colonies pay off their own war debts.
- DThe immediate repeal of the Townshend Acts in response to the Boston Tea Party to prevent military conflict.
Answer
The transition from a period of salutary neglect to the assertion of direct parliamentary authority and revenue-raising taxes.
The correct answer is correct because Samuel Johnson's defense of parliamentary sovereignty and virtual representation directly supported the British government's decision to end the era of salutary neglect. Following the Seven Years' War, Britain sought to integrate the colonies more closely into the empire and raise revenue to pay off war debt through direct taxes, which the colonists resisted.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
The shift in British imperial policy after the Seven Years' War and the resulting debate over parliamentary sovereignty.
Estimated Time:1m 30s