"This treaty does not promote collective security, nor does it entangle us in the political disputes of Europe. It does not write into our law any obligation to send our soldiers to fight in foreign wars. On the contrary, it maintains our traditional policy of independence and unilateral action, while setting a moral standard for the world to follow. We remain the sole judges of our duty and our interest."
—Senator William Borah, Senate debate, 1928
The arguments expressed in the excerpt are best understood as an attempt to reconcile which of the following competing impulses in interwar United States foreign policy?
- The desire to actively shape international diplomacy to prevent conflict and the determination to avoid binding collective security obligations.Answer
- BThe commitment to absolute economic isolationism and the need to protect existing overseas territories acquired in the Spanish-American War.
- CThe enforcement of the Monroe Doctrine through military alliances in Europe and the advocacy for complete global demilitarization.
- DThe integration of American defense strategies with the League of Nations and the promotion of bilateral trade agreements.
Answer
The desire to actively shape international diplomacy to prevent conflict and the determination to avoid binding collective security obligations.
The correct answer is correct because interwar United States foreign policy was characterized by unilateralism. The United States sought to maintain global peace and stability through disarmament treaties (like the Five-Power Treaty) and symbolic declarations (like the Kellogg-Briand Pact) but deliberately avoided joining the League of Nations or signing any treaties that would obligate it to collective military action, thereby preserving its freedom of action.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
Interwar Foreign Policy and Unilateralism