Question

Difficulty: Very hardInterwar Foreign Policy and Road to World War II

"This treaty does not promote collective security, nor does it entangle us in the political disputes of Europe. It does not write into our law any obligation to send our soldiers to fight in foreign wars. On the contrary, it maintains our traditional policy of independence and unilateral action, while setting a moral standard for the world to follow. We remain the sole judges of our duty and our interest."

—Senator William Borah, Senate debate, 1928

The arguments expressed in the excerpt are best understood as an attempt to reconcile which of the following competing impulses in interwar United States foreign policy?

  1. The desire to actively shape international diplomacy to prevent conflict and the determination to avoid binding collective security obligations.Answer
  2. B
    The commitment to absolute economic isolationism and the need to protect existing overseas territories acquired in the Spanish-American War.
  3. C
    The enforcement of the Monroe Doctrine through military alliances in Europe and the advocacy for complete global demilitarization.
  4. D
    The integration of American defense strategies with the League of Nations and the promotion of bilateral trade agreements.

Answer

The desire to actively shape international diplomacy to prevent conflict and the determination to avoid binding collective security obligations.
The correct answer is correct because interwar United States foreign policy was characterized by unilateralism. The United States sought to maintain global peace and stability through disarmament treaties (like the Five-Power Treaty) and symbolic declarations (like the Kellogg-Briand Pact) but deliberately avoided joining the League of Nations or signing any treaties that would obligate it to collective military action, thereby preserving its freedom of action.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the stimulus context and the source.
The excerpt is from Senator William Borah in 1928, speaking during the debate over a treaty (specifically the Kellogg-Briand Pact). Borah emphasizes that the treaty does not obligate the U.S. to military action or collective security, while maintaining 'unilateral action' and 'moral standards.'
Understanding the context of the late 1920s foreign policy is essential to identifying the tension between international engagement and the rejection of binding alliances.
2
Identify the core characteristics of interwar foreign policy.
Rather than retreating into absolute isolationism, the United States pursued unilateral diplomacy (e.g., Washington Naval Conference, Kellogg-Briand Pact) to stabilize international relations and protect its economic interests, while strictly avoiding formal alliances or collective security commitments (like the League of Nations).
This establishes the historical pattern of unilateralism and selective engagement during the interwar period.
3
Evaluate the options based on historical evidence and the stimulus.
The correct option accurately describes this dual approach: participating in international peace efforts while retaining complete sovereignty and freedom of action. The distractors misrepresent U.S. policy as either absolute isolationism, a misapplication of the Monroe Doctrine to Europe, or cooperation with the League of Nations.
Selecting the option that correctly contrasts the promotion of diplomacy with the rejection of collective security resolves the question.

Key Concept

Interwar Foreign Policy and Unilateralism
Rate this question