"Individual invasion of individual rights is not the subject-matter of the [Fourteenth] amendment. It has a deeper and broader scope. It nullifies and makes void all State legislation, and State action of every kind, which impairs the privileges and immunities of citizens of the United States... It does not authorize Congress to create a code of municipal law for the regulation of private rights; but to provide modes of redress against the operation of State laws, and the action of State officers..."
— Justice Joseph P. Bradley, majority opinion in the *Civil Rights Cases* (1883)
Which of the following was a direct consequence of the Supreme Court decision excerpted above?
- AThe immediate deployment of federal troops to Southern states to protect voter registration
- BThe invalidation of state-level laws that established poll taxes and literacy tests
- The expansion of racial segregation in private businesses and public accommodations throughout the SouthAnswer
- DThe establishment of a federal regulatory agency to oversee industrial working conditions
Answer
The expansion of racial segregation in private businesses and public accommodations throughout the South
The correct answer is correct because the Civil Rights Cases of 1883 established the 'state action doctrine,' ruling that the Fourteenth Amendment only restricted discriminatory actions by state governments, not by private citizens or businesses. This judicial narrowing of the amendment's protections directly facilitated the systemic implementation of Jim Crow segregation in theaters, restaurants, hotels, and transportation across the South.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
Legal segregation and the narrowing of the Fourteenth Amendment during the Jim Crow era
Estimated Time:1m 30s