Examkin

Question

Difficulty: MediumEnvironmentalism and the Energy Crisis

"We are told that we must choose between the preservation of our environment and the development of energy resources to secure our economy and national defense. This is a false choice. Yet the rush to approve the trans-Alaska pipeline, bypassing the environmental safeguards established by the National Environmental Policy Act, demonstrates a willingness to sacrifice long-term ecological balance for a temporary supply of oil. True energy security will not be found in draining our wilderness, but in reducing our conservation efforts and transitioning to sustainable alternatives."

—Statement by a representative of the Wilderness Society, congressional testimony, 1973

The debate described in the excerpt most directly reflects which of the following conflicts in the United States during the 1970s?

  1. A
    The federal government's adherence to strict laissez-faire policies that prevented any public regulation or subsidies of energy infrastructure
  2. The clash between public demands for environmental protection and efforts to address energy shortages caused by foreign supply disruptionsAnswer
  3. C
    A struggle to contain communist influence in oil-producing regions of Latin America by expanding domestic extraction
  4. D
    The implementation of supply-side economic reforms to curb stagflation by dismantling federal environmental agencies

Answer

The clash between public demands for environmental protection and efforts to address energy shortages caused by foreign supply disruptions
The correct answer is correct because the 1970s represented a period where the newly formed environmental movement clashed directly with policies designed to resolve domestic energy shortages. The 1973 OPEC oil embargo caused severe inflation and fuel shortages, leading the federal government to fast-track projects like the trans-Alaska pipeline to boost domestic energy production, sparking intense resistance from environmental organizations concerned with conservation and ecosystem protection.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the historical context of the stimulus document.
The excerpt shows a 1973 debate over the trans-Alaska pipeline, where environmentalists argue against bypassing environmental laws in the name of energy resource development.
Identifying the date (1973) and the core argument of the Wilderness Society establishes the dual focus on environmental protection and energy needs.
2
Connect the debate to the broader historical events of the 1970s.
The 1970s were characterized by the rise of modern environmentalism (e.g., Earth Day, NEPA, EPA) and the energy crises initiated by the 1973 OPEC oil embargo.
This step contextualizes the legislative rush to build the pipeline as a reaction to foreign oil disruptions and the subsequent domestic energy shortages.
3
Evaluate the choices to identify which conflict aligns with both historical developments.
The option describing the conflict between public environmental demands and actions taken to combat energy shortages directly matches the core tension of the era.
This option correctly links the environmental lobby's goals with the geopolitical pressure of the energy crisis.

Key Concept

The tension between environmental regulation and energy demands during the 1970s energy crises.
Rate this question

Topics

Environmentalism and the Energy Crisis

More questions from this topic