"In a pure democracy the people are all met, and conduct the public business themselves. In a representative republic, the power of making laws is delegated to a select number of citizens elected by the rest. In so extensive a republic, the great officers of government would soon become above the control of the people... They will use the power, when they have acquired it, to the gratification of their own interest and ambition."
— Brutus No. 1, 1787
The ideas expressed in the excerpt address which of the following core debates concerning the ratification of the United States Constitution?
- AWhether the federal government should have the authority to establish a national bank to manage state debts.
- Whether a representative republican government could successfully preserve liberty over a large geographic area.Answer
- CWhether the weakness of the central government under the Articles of Confederation required the creation of a standing national army to prevent rebellions.
- DWhether the Articles of Confederation should be amended to allow the national congress to directly regulate interstate commerce.
Answer
Whether a representative republican government could successfully preserve liberty over a large geographic area.
The correct answer is correct because the excerpt from Brutus No. 1 outlines a classic Anti-Federalist argument: a large, consolidated republic ('so extensive a republic') is incompatible with liberty and representative government. Brutus argues that representatives in a large territory would become detached from the citizenry and abuse their power, which directly relates to the ratification debate over the proper size and scope of a representative republic.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
The debate between Federalists and Anti-Federalists over the size of the republic and the relationship between representatives and the electorate.
Estimated Time:1m 30s