"We, the Creek Nation, view with serious alarm the proposition to divide our lands in severalty and to destroy our national government... Under our present system of holding lands in common, we have lived in peace and security... To force individual allotment upon us will open our country to land speculators, reduce our people to poverty, and ultimately destroy our existence as a distinct tribe."
— Petition of the Creek Nation to the United States Congress, 1895
The concerns expressed in the petition most directly respond to which of the following federal policies of the late nineteenth century?
- The implementation of the General Allotment Act, which aimed to assimilate Native Americans through the division of tribal lands into individual plotsAnswer
- BThe establishment of the reservation system to permanently protect tribal land rights and support cultural preservation
- CThe Supreme Court rulings that recognized tribal nations as fully independent sovereign states exempt from federal authority
- DThe formation of a unified military and political alliance of all North American tribes to establish a single sovereign Native state
Answer
The implementation of the General Allotment Act, which aimed to assimilate Native Americans through the division of tribal lands into individual plots
The correct answer is the option stating that the policy was the implementation of the General Allotment Act. The Creek Nation's 1895 petition directly objects to dividing tribal lands 'in severalty' and forcing 'individual allotment,' which were the core mechanisms of the Dawes Severalty (General Allotment) Act of 1887. The federal government intended this policy to dismantle tribal structures, assimilate Native Americans into Euro-American farming lifestyles, and open up remaining 'surplus' tribal lands to white settlers and land speculators.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
The Dawes Severalty Act of 1887 and the policy of assimilation through land allotment.