Examkin

Question

Difficulty: Very hardSectional Compromises and Legislative Crises

Read the excerpt below:

'Resolved, That the territories of the United States belong to the several States of this Union as their common property; that the citizens of the several States have equal rights to migrate with their property into these territories, and are equally entitled to the protection of the Federal Government in the enjoyment of that property so long as the territories remain in a territorial state.'
— Resolutions of the Nashville Convention, June 1850

Which of the following best explains how the political argument in the excerpt clashed with the concept of popular sovereignty as championed by Northern Democrats like Stephen A. Douglas?

  1. A
    Popular sovereignty gave the federal executive branch the authority to mandate the expansion of slavery, whereas the excerpt claims that only individual states could determine the legal status of property.
  2. Popular sovereignty permitted territorial legislatures to exclude slavery before statehood, whereas the excerpt asserts that the federal government must protect slaveholders' property rights throughout the territorial period.Answer
  3. C
    Popular sovereignty focused on resolving sectional tariff rates in western territories, whereas the excerpt prioritizes the protection of Southern agricultural exports.
  4. D
    Popular sovereignty required a unanimous vote of all state legislatures to admit a slave state, whereas the excerpt argues that any citizen could veto congressional legislation regarding territorial organization.

Answer

Popular sovereignty permitted territorial legislatures to exclude slavery before statehood, whereas the excerpt asserts that the federal government must protect slaveholders' property rights throughout the territorial period.
The correct option is correct because popular sovereignty, as advocated by Stephen A. Douglas, allowed settlers in a territory to vote on the status of slavery, which Douglas argued in the Freeport Doctrine could practically exclude slavery before statehood. In contrast, the Nashville Convention resolutions argued that the territories were common property of the states and that the federal government had an obligation to protect slaveholders' property rights throughout the territorial phase, preventing any territorial ban on slavery.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the source text of the Nashville Convention Resolutions (1850) to identify its core constitutional argument.
The text argues that territories are the common property of the states and that slaveholders have a right to federal property protection there.
Understanding the Southern rights argument is necessary to compare it to other territorial policies of the era.
2
Analyze the core components of the concept of popular sovereignty as championed by Northern Democrats like Stephen A. Douglas.
Popular sovereignty allowed the residents of a territory to vote on whether to permit or ban slavery during the territorial phase.
Establishing Douglas's position is required to identify the points of conflict between the two constitutional views.
3
Contrast the two positions to determine how they clashed over the extension of slavery.
The Southern view demanded federal protection of slavery and denied that territorial legislatures could ban it, while popular sovereignty allowed local exclusion of slavery.
Comparing the mechanisms of territorial governance reveals the fundamental ideological division between Southern Democrats and Northern Democrats.

Key Concept

Sectional Compromises and Legislative Crises
Estimated Time:2m 0s
Rate this question

Topics

Sectional Compromises and Legislative Crises

More questions from this topic