“Once we suffer large casualties, we will have started a well-nigh irreversible process. Our involvement will be so great that we cannot—without national humiliation—withdraw before achieving our objectives. Of the two evils, Americanization of the war is worse than the defeat of the South Vietnamese government.”
—George Ball, Undersecretary of State, memorandum to President Lyndon B. Johnson, July 1965
The perspective expressed in the memorandum most directly challenges which of the following assumptions of United States foreign policy during the Cold War?
- AThe strategy of Vietnamization, which sought to shift the burden of combat to local South Vietnamese forces.
- BThe view that the conflict in Vietnam was a localized civil war unconnected to the global spread of communism.
- The belief that containment required the United States to militarily intervene to support any non-communist government, regardless of its stability.Answer
- DThe assumption that the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution had legally established a formal congressional declaration of war.
Answer
The belief that containment required the United States to militarily intervene to support any non-communist government, regardless of its stability.
The correct answer is correct because George Ball's memorandum warns against the 'Americanization' of the war, arguing that direct military escalation to support a failing South Vietnamese government would lead to an irreversible commitment and national humiliation. This directly challenged the prevailing containment doctrine (and the related domino theory), which assumed that the United States had to militarily intervene to prevent any communist expansion, regardless of the local political conditions or the viability of the client state.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
The conflict between containment doctrine commitments and the risks of military escalation in Vietnam.
Estimated Time:1m 30s