Question

Difficulty: HardWorld War I: Mobilization and the Home Front

"Whether we will or not, we are citizens of the world... We cannot isolate ourselves from the rest of humanity... But more than that, we must ensure that our participation in this great struggle leads to the democratization of our own industrial life. Labor has a right to be represented in the councils of the nation. In this time of national peril, the American Federation of Labor pledges its cooperation to the government, but in return, we expect the recognition of the eight-hour day, the right of workers to organize, and the maintenance of decent standards of living. Patriotism must not be used as a shield for corporate greed."

— Samuel Gompers, President of the American Federation of Labor, address to the AFL Executive Council, April 1917

Which of the following was a direct consequence of the cooperation pledged in the excerpt during World War I?

  1. A
    The federal government's adherence to strict laissez-faire policies that allowed private employers to settle disputes without state intervention.
  2. B
    The permanent legislative establishment of the National Labor Relations Act to guarantee collective bargaining rights nationwide.
  3. The creation of federal mediation bodies that temporarily protected workers' right to organize in exchange for labor's agreement not to strike.Answer
  4. D
    The formation of a unified political coalition between moderate trade unionists and radical socialists to nationalize key industrial sectors.

Answer

The creation of federal mediation bodies that temporarily protected workers' right to organize in exchange for labor's agreement not to strike.
The correct answer is correct because to prevent strikes from halting war mobilization, the Wilson administration created the National War Labor Board (NWLB) in 1918. The NWLB mediated labor disputes, recognized workers' rights to organize, and supported the eight-hour day, while in return, Samuel Gompers and the AFL agreed to a no-strike pledge during the wartime emergency.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the stimulus context and the author's argument.
The excerpt is from Samuel Gompers, head of the AFL, in April 1917, expressing willingness to cooperate with the federal government's mobilization for World War I, but demanding labor representation, the eight-hour workday, and the right to organize in exchange.
This establishes the historical context of the home front mobilization during WWI and the bargaining position of mainstream organized labor.
2
Evaluate the federal government's actual policy response to organized labor during World War I.
The federal government established agencies like the National War Labor Board (NWLB) to prevent strikes that could disrupt war production. The NWLB granted labor demands such as the eight-hour workday and collective bargaining rights in exchange for unions pledging not to strike.
This identifies the direct historical consequence of the cooperation described in the prompt.
3
Compare the historical facts with the provided answer choices.
The option describing federal mediation bodies and the no-strike pledge matches this response. Other options describe permanent legislation (which did not happen until the New Deal), strict laissez-faire policies (which were abandoned during the war), or moderate-radical alliances (which did not occur due to deep ideological divides and federal crackdowns on radicals).
This confirms the correct option while eliminating the distractors.

Key Concept

During World War I, the federal government temporarily expanded its economic control and partnered with organized labor (specifically the American Federation of Labor) to guarantee uninterrupted industrial production. The National War Labor Board mediated disputes, granting major concessions to unions in exchange for a no-strike agreement.
Rate this question