Examkin

Question

Difficulty: HardPolitics, Hamilton's Plan, and Foreign Policy in the New Republic

Read the excerpt below.

"Our government is in its nature a government of departments... The House of Representatives has a right to exercise its discretion in making appropriations for the foreign department... To say that we must appropriate for whatever offices the President chooses to create is to reduce this House to a mere registering body."
— Representative Albert Gallatin, speech in the House of Representatives, 1798

The constitutional argument presented in the excerpt most directly reflects which of the following political positions of the 1790s?

  1. The Democratic-Republican advocacy for legislative oversight to prevent the expansion of executive power.Answer
  2. B
    The Federalist belief that the executive branch required broad autonomy to conduct foreign affairs.
  3. C
    The Anti-Federalist assertion that the Articles of Confederation provided a better framework for limiting centralized authority.
  4. D
    The Western agrarian demand that the federal government focus on domestic trade rather than foreign diplomacy.

Answer

The Democratic-Republican advocacy for legislative oversight to prevent the expansion of executive power.
The correct answer is the option stating that the argument reflects the Democratic-Republican advocacy for legislative oversight to prevent the expansion of executive power. During the 1790s, Democratic-Republicans feared that the Federalist administration under John Adams was aggrandizing executive power at the expense of the legislature and public liberty. Gallatin's defense of the House's power of the purse reflects the Democratic-Republican strategy of using checks and balances to restrain the presidency.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the source and the speaker.
The speaker is Representative Albert Gallatin, a prominent Democratic-Republican, speaking in 1798 during the Quasi-War crisis.
Understanding the political alignment of the speaker helps identify the ideological perspective of the argument.
2
Examine the core constitutional argument within the text.
Gallatin argues that the House of Representatives possesses the discretionary authority to grant or deny funding for diplomatic offices created by the President, preventing the House from becoming a 'mere registering body.'
This establishes that the conflict is over the limits of executive power versus legislative control of the purse.
3
Connect the argument to the broader political divisions of the First Party System.
The debate represents the classic division between Democratic-Republicans, who favored strict construction and legislative power to prevent tyranny, and Federalists, who favored a strong, active executive branch.
This connects the specific debate in the House to the correct political faction and their core beliefs.

Key Concept

Checks and balances and the rise of early political factions over executive authority and foreign policy.
Rate this question

Topics

Politics, Hamilton's Plan, and Foreign Policy in the New Republic

More questions from this topic