"We rely greatly on the sure operation of a complete blockade of the Atlantic and Gulf ports... in connection with such a movement down the Mississippi river to the Gulf, with a cordon of posts on the line of that river, as to completely envelop the seceding States, and actually clear the Mississippi from the mouth of the Ohio to the Gulf. This, with the blockade, will envelop them, and bring them to terms with less bloodshed than by any other plan."
—General Winfield Scott, letter to Major General George B. McClellan, May 3, 1861
Which of the following best explains why the strategic plan outlined in the excerpt initially faced significant opposition from the Union public and political leaders?
- ACritics argued that the Union lacked the industrial capacity and naval resources to sustain a long-term blockade.
- BAbolitionists objected that the plan failed to prioritize the immediate emancipation of enslaved populations as a primary war goal.
- Many northern leaders believed the war could be won quickly through a direct march on the Confederate capital.Answer
- DDiplomats warned that establishing a naval blockade would violate international law and provoke war with Great Britain.
Answer
Many northern leaders believed the war could be won quickly through a direct march on the Confederate capital.
The correct answer is correct because at the outbreak of the Civil War in the spring of 1861, both the northern public and political leaders believed the conflict would be short and resolved by a single, decisive Union victory. There was immense pressure on the military to launch an immediate campaign to capture Richmond, the Confederate capital. General Winfield Scott's Anaconda Plan, which proposed a slow economic strangulation of the South through a naval blockade and control of the Mississippi River, was criticized as too passive and slow-moving.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
Union Military Strategy and the Anaconda Plan
Estimated Time:2m 0s