Examkin

Question

Difficulty: MediumWorld War I: Diplomacy, Military, and Postwar Peace

"The League of Nations . . . is not a league of peoples, but a league of governments—of the dominant governments of the world. . . . It is a league to maintain the status quo, to preserve the boundaries of the world as they are today, and to keep the subject nations of the world in subjection to the great imperial powers. . . . The Treaty of Versailles . . . does not make for peace. It makes for war. It contains within itself the seeds of future conflicts."
— Senator Robert M. La Follette, speech in the U.S. Senate, November 1919

Which of the following historical arguments is most consistent with the ideas expressed in the excerpt?

  1. A
    The United States should adopt a policy of absolute isolationism and withdraw from all international economic transactions.
  2. B
    The League of Nations was necessary to enforce the Monroe Doctrine and protect the Western Hemisphere from European colonizers.
  3. United States participation in the League of Nations would violate the nation's traditional policy of avoiding foreign entanglements.Answer
  4. D
    Membership in the League of Nations would automatically commit the United States to join military containment alliances against communist expansion.

Answer

United States participation in the League of Nations would violate the nation's traditional policy of avoiding foreign entanglements.
The correct option is the one stating that United States participation in the League of Nations would violate the nation's traditional policy of avoiding foreign entanglements. Senator La Follette was a progressive who aligned with isolationist/unilateralist arguments during the Senate debate over the Treaty of Versailles. He argued that joining the League of Nations would entangle the United States in foreign alliances designed to maintain the imperialist status quo, contradicting the long-standing American tradition of preserving unilateral diplomatic action and avoiding foreign military entanglements.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the stimulus passage.
Identify Senator Robert M. La Follette's core argument: he asserts that the League of Nations is an alliance of dominant imperialist governments designed to preserve the status quo, which will lead to future conflicts rather than peace.
Understanding the main thesis of the stimulus is essential for identifying the historical argument that aligns with it.
2
Evaluate the options in the context of early twentieth-century U.S. foreign policy debates.
Determine how the various arguments connect to the debate over the Treaty of Versailles. La Follette's fear of entangling alliances and preservation of imperial power maps directly onto the traditional American foreign policy debate regarding avoiding foreign alliances, whereas other options conflate terms (absolute isolationism vs. unilateralism) or apply incorrect historical contexts (Monroe Doctrine, containment).
This step distinguishes the correct historical argument from common student misconceptions and chronological errors.
3
Select the correct option representing La Follette's alignment with anti-entanglement principles.
The option asserting that U.S. participation in the League of Nations would violate the nation's traditional policy of avoiding foreign entanglements is the only historically accurate and consistent choice.
This completes the selection process by confirming the alignment between the stimulus and the correct option.

Key Concept

The Senate debate over the ratification of the Treaty of Versailles and the League of Nations, illustrating the tension between internationalism and unilateral isolationist traditions.
Estimated Time:1m 30s
Rate this question

Topics

World War I: Diplomacy, Military, and Postwar Peace

More questions from this topic