Question

Difficulty: HardThe War on Terror and Post-9/11 Security

"We stand closely allied to a global doctrine of paranoia—a foreign policy based on the concept of preemption... This nation, for all its dynamic youth, is in the process of becoming an empire, and it is doing so in a way that is bound to fail. The image of the United States as a beacon of liberty and law is being replaced by that of a nation determined to dominate the world by force. We have ignored our allies, bypassed the United Nations, and launched a war against a nation that did not attack us."

— Senator Robert Byrd, speech in the United States Senate, March 19, 2003

The foreign policy approach criticized in the excerpt was most directly a response to which of the following developments?

  1. The belief that traditional strategies of containment and deterrence were ineffective against non-state adversariesAnswer
  2. B
    The dissolution of the Soviet Union, which immediately prompted the United States to seek new territory for imperial expansion
  3. C
    A broad consensus in Congress to reduce international commitments and return to a policy of isolationism
  4. D
    The creation of international coalitions designed to replace the United Nations as the primary arbiter of global conflicts

Answer

The belief that traditional strategies of containment and deterrence were ineffective against non-state adversaries
The correct option is correct because the post-9/11 foreign policy shift toward preemption was based on the belief that traditional strategies of containment and deterrence were ineffective against decentralized, non-state terrorist networks.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the stimulus to identify the policy criticized.
The speech by Senator Robert Byrd critiques the U.S. policy of preemption, unilateral military action, and bypassing international institutions like the United Nations.
Identifying the target of the critique is necessary to determine the historical cause.
2
Contextualize the policy shift in the post-9/11 era.
The Bush Doctrine of preemption was formulated after the September 11 attacks, based on the rationale that traditional containment and deterrence could not prevent attacks by non-state actors.
This establishes the historical cause behind the foreign policy shift.
3
Evaluate the choices against this historical context.
The correct answer accurately links the policy to the belief that Cold War-era strategies were inadequate against non-state adversaries.
This matches the historical development that drove the policy shift.

Key Concept

The War on Terror and Post-9/11 Security
Rate this question