"We have today in the United States a large number of people who have not been assimilated... They live in colonies of their own, speak their own languages, and maintain their own customs. More dangerously, many of them bring with them the destructive doctrines of anarchy and bolshevism, which threaten the very foundations of our constitutional republic. If we do not close the gates, or at least restrict their entry to those who can truly become Americans, we risk the destruction of our institutions from within."
—Representative John C. Box, congressional debate on immigration restriction, 1921
Which of the following developments of the 1920s is most directly reflected in the sentiments expressed in the excerpt?
- The convergence of anti-immigrant nativism and postwar anxieties over political radicalismAnswer
- BA growing belief that the United States must abandon its unilateralist foreign policy to intervene in European affairs
- CThe emergence of an agrarian-led Populist coalition seeking federal regulation of industrial monopolies
- DA strict application of laissez-faire principles that prevented the federal government from regulating the national labor supply
Answer
The convergence of anti-immigrant nativism and postwar anxieties over political radicalism
The correct answer is correct because the speaker's concerns about foreign languages, customs, anarchy, and bolshevism directly show the merging of nativist anxieties about immigrant assimilation with Red Scare fears of political radicalism. This dual fear motivated Congress to pass the Emergency Quota Act of 1921 and later the National Origins Act of 1924, representing a major shift in U.S. immigration policy.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
The intersection of nativism and the First Red Scare in the early 1920s, which culminated in restrictive federal immigration legislation.