"By the proposed distribution of our lands in severalty, we see the certain and speedy destruction of our tribal governments and the absorption of our people by the white race. Our system of holding land in common has been the shield of our existence. To destroy it is to open the door to speculation and to leave our people landless and homeless."
— Creek Nation delegation, petition to the United States government, 1885
Which of the following federal policies of the late nineteenth century was the Creek delegation responding to in the excerpt?
- AThe negotiation of new treaties intended to protect tribal sovereignty and land holdings
- BThe hands-off (laissez-faire) approach of the federal government toward western land development
- The passage of legislation to divide tribal lands into individual family farmsAnswer
- DThe enactment of constitutional amendments guaranteeing citizenship and voting rights to Native Americans
Answer
The passage of legislation to divide tribal lands into individual family farms
The correct option is correct because the Creek delegation's petition directly opposes the 'distribution of our lands in severalty' and the end of 'holding land in common.' This directly refers to the federal policy of allotment, which was codified in the Dawes Severalty Act of 1887. This act sought to break up tribal reservation lands into individual family plots to force assimilation and open remaining lands to white settlement.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
The Dawes Severalty Act of 1887 and the policy of assimilation